Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Request - geog lookup tool #8620

Open
1 task done
dustymc opened this issue Mar 19, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
1 task done

Request - geog lookup tool #8620

dustymc opened this issue Mar 19, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Function-Locality/Event/Georeferencing Priority-Normal (Not urgent) Normal because this needs to get done but not immediately.
Milestone
Active Development

Comments

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Mar 19, 2025

Help us understand your request (check below):

  • new feature or otherwise a good idea to make Arctos even better

Describe what you're trying to do

https://github.com/ArctosDB/internal/issues/366#issuecomment-2737846862

I think we've got a solid direction, reviving the lookup tool makes sense to me.

@ArctosDB/geo-group or anyone else, thoughts or objections?

Ping @acdoll
@dustymc dustymc added this to the Active Development milestone Mar 19, 2025
@mkoo
Copy link
Member

mkoo commented Mar 24, 2025

No objections to lookup tool resuscitation --- yay!

@mkoo mkoo added Priority-Normal (Not urgent) Normal because this needs to get done but not immediately. Function-Locality/Event/Georeferencing Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! labels Mar 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Function-Locality/Event/Georeferencing Priority-Normal (Not urgent) Normal because this needs to get done but not immediately.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Active Development
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mkoo @dustymc