Los Carneros History

[elistockwell]

This AVA has the following revisions:

• [T.D. ATF-142, 48 FR 37368, Aug. 18, 1983]
• [T.D. ATF-249, 52 FR 5956, Feb. 27, 1987]
• [T.D. TTB-55, 71 FR 66455, Nov. 15, 2006]

Each revision should be represented by a polygon inside the .geojson file for this AVA. See the Adding Historical Boundaries document for more information on how to add historical boundaries.

[elistockwell]

One technical amendment that adds references to maps in boundary description for clarity (no actual boundary change) and one name change amendment (Carneros -> Los Carneros). Worth adding history? If so, both amendments or just name change?

[MicheleTobias]

We decided that minor corrections to a boundary description that don't change the actual boundary don't need a new polygon, BUT if the name changes, we do need a new polygon even if none of the other attributes change.

[elistockwell]

I was wrong, it is actually not a name change. The name was always Los Carneros, but the recent amendment adds a part in the introductory text that says "Carneros" can also be used. I guess that would only affect the sameas field, so not worth a revision.

[MicheleTobias]

If it affects the attributes, we need a revision. It might be the same boundary but we need that information. It would go in the "aka" (also known as) field.