Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix integration with BlockArrays #308

Open
mofeing opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Fix integration with BlockArrays #308

mofeing opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
ci/cd Continuous Integration / Continuous Deployment enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@mofeing
Copy link
Member

mofeing commented Jan 31, 2025

Now that we are heading to a multi-vendor contract implementation, we can think of fixing the BlockArrays.jl support. Tests exists for it but due to a change in OMEinsum, it stopped working. We now need to add our own integration code between contract and BlockArrays.jl.

This is quite low-priority, but could be benefitial for some integration with MPI I was planning.
@mofeing mofeing added ci/cd Continuous Integration / Continuous Deployment enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ci/cd Continuous Integration / Continuous Deployment enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mofeing