Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom modification search #80

Open
treko90 opened this issue Nov 13, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Custom modification search #80

treko90 opened this issue Nov 13, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@treko90
Copy link

treko90 commented Nov 13, 2024

Hi, is it possible to somehow pass the customized Unimod database to PepQuery for modification search? For example, Unimod file contains various isotopic labels which are not relevant for my experimental setting and sometimes identification is confused by them.

I'm asking because I see that the PepQuery version on the github refers to unimod.xml file in the resources directory but there is no such directory or file in in the latest downloadable PepQuery

@wenbostar
Copy link
Collaborator

It is packaged inside the jar file. I could add a command line option to use a user-defined unimod file.

@treko90
Copy link
Author

treko90 commented Nov 27, 2024

Thank you.

Another question - I want to search for a potential SNP in my proteomic data.
My reference sequence is TGHDFPIDTK and its variant should be TGHEFPIDTK.
I want to distinguish between TGH(D->E)FPIDTK and TGHDFPI(D->E)TK so I've searched for TGHEFPIDTK and put -aa tag to the pepquery run command. However, this causes that peptide is reported as not confident (because its aa substitution of the reference peptide) but TGH(D->E)FPIDTK suggestion (passed other tests) can be found in ptm_detail table without any other candidate. Can such not-confident peptide be actually considered as confident?

@wenbostar
Copy link
Collaborator

For the spectrum matched to TGHEFPIDTK, you could compare it with predicted spectra from TGHEFPIDTK and TGHDFPI(D->E)TK using PDV to see which one gives you higher correlation.

@treko90
Copy link
Author

treko90 commented Nov 28, 2024

But wouldnt PepQuerys UMS with -aa option automatically provide the scores for both variants if they were competitive?

@wenbostar
Copy link
Collaborator

If "-fast" is NOT set, you will be able to find the scores for compared reference peptides for a given target peptide in file ptm_detail.txt.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants