-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.3k
Limit the speed of Virtual Component #44878
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Thanks for contacting us. We're moving this issue to the |
Supporting items with varying height is currently being tracked in #25058, so let's use this issue to track throttling the rate at which the browser sends spacer visibility updates to .NET. |
We've moved this issue to the Backlog milestone. This means that it is not going to be worked on for the coming release. We will reassess the backlog following the current release and consider this item at that time. To learn more about our issue management process and to have better expectation regarding different types of issues you can read our Triage Process. |
We've moved this issue to the Backlog milestone. This means that it is not going to be worked on for the coming release. We will reassess the backlog following the current release and consider this item at that time. To learn more about our issue management process and to have better expectation regarding different types of issues you can read our Triage Process. |
Is there an existing issue for this?
Describe the bug
When using Virtualize, we may encounter a problem when the size of the component is different (the element may go outside the area).
Then the components will not function properly and spam occurs in a function call that could trigger a ddos attack.
I believe that it is worth discussing this problem and creating a default limit of e.g. 100ms.
The topic was covered in another issue here:
#44430 (comment)
Expected Behavior
No response
Steps To Reproduce
No response
Exceptions (if any)
No response
.NET Version
blazor .net 7 rc 2
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: