-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inconsistent debug_storageRangeAt
Behavior in Erigon 2.60.10
#12726
Comments
works in e3, due to upcoming release e2 is not priority |
I retested the For example, my response looks like this: {
"storage": {
"0x290decd9548b62a8d60345a988386fc84ba6bc95484008f6362f93160ef3e563": {
"key": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"value": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000067d3fe29"
},
"0xb10e2d527612073b26eecdfd717e6a320cf44b4afac2b0732d9fcbe2b7fa0cf6": {
"key": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001",
"value": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000067d3fe1d"
},
"0x405787fa12a823e0f2b7631cc41b3ba8828b3321ca811111fa75cd3aa3bb5ace": {
"key": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002",
"value": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000067d3fe1d"
}
},
"nextKey": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004"
} In contrast, a geth archive node iterates based on the key hashes (starting from the first hash after provided I realize the initial note mentioned that E3 was working and E2 wasn't a priority for an upcoming release, but it seems this behavior still persists in v3. |
System information
Erigon version:
Erigon/2.60.10
OS & Version:
Ubuntu 24.04
Commit hash:
Erigon Command (with flags/config):
Consensus Layer: Lighthouse
Chain/Network: Mainnet Ethereum
Expected behaviour
Calling a geth archive node we get a full accurate response:
Actual behaviour
When calling an erigon archive node we get 0x000 key values which are not accurate.
Steps to reproduce the behaviour
See Erigon Command^^^
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: