You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The dataset network construct allows to link individual datasets across different publishers for joint presentation and access. This serves different scenarios:
networks collecting a set of datasets that is as complete as possible concerning the network theme for joint presentation and/or reporting
networks of collaborators, where datasets are added selectively based on their relevance to the more formal collaboration
In the first case, self-selecting network membership by the publisher of a dataset is desirable, to cast the net as widely as possible. In the second case, however, network membership is more closely curated, with the network deciding which datasets should belong to the network, and which ones should not.
The current IPT synchronization with the registry displays all available networks, and allows self-assignment for all of them. We are looking for a solution where a network (e.g. via a registry marker/tag) can opt for e.g. invisibility in the IPT UI, a rejection of network links, or some other mechanism that prevents dataset publishers to join a dataset to the network.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
MachineTag sounds right, but I suppose it would rather make the network invisible in certain contexts, to be managed by the network curator through the registry instead. The organization qualifier can be rather high-maintenance, as we often do not know in advance / are not in control, or the scope is fluid
The dataset network construct allows to link individual datasets across different publishers for joint presentation and access. This serves different scenarios:
In the first case, self-selecting network membership by the publisher of a dataset is desirable, to cast the net as widely as possible. In the second case, however, network membership is more closely curated, with the network deciding which datasets should belong to the network, and which ones should not.
The current IPT synchronization with the registry displays all available networks, and allows self-assignment for all of them. We are looking for a solution where a network (e.g. via a registry marker/tag) can opt for e.g. invisibility in the IPT UI, a rejection of network links, or some other mechanism that prevents dataset publishers to join a dataset to the network.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: