Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 2, 2020. It is now read-only.

Close-reading audit: Identification phase #324

Closed
jessicaschilling opened this issue Oct 3, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Close-reading audit: Identification phase #324

jessicaschilling opened this issue Oct 3, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
dif/easy Someone with a little familiarity can pick up effort/hours Estimated to take one or several hours topic/design-content Content design, writing, information architecture topic/docs Documentation

Comments

@jessicaschilling
Copy link
Contributor

jessicaschilling commented Oct 3, 2019

This issue is part of Epic 3C: Content-focused "close reading" audit.

Identify all materials to be considered "IPFS documentation" for purposes of conducting a close-reading audit. This could include ...

  • Contents of existing docs.ipfs.io site
  • Main ipfs.io site (under the assumption that such high-level content is actually the highest level of documtentation)
  • Contents of go-ipfs and js-ipfs repos
  • Contents of additional ipfs/* repos, to be discovered
@ericronne ericronne self-assigned this Oct 3, 2019
@ericronne ericronne removed their assignment Oct 3, 2019
@jessicaschilling jessicaschilling added topic/design-content Content design, writing, information architecture dif/easy Someone with a little familiarity can pick up effort/hours Estimated to take one or several hours labels Oct 3, 2019
@jessicaschilling jessicaschilling changed the title Identify all IPFS docs to be examined Close-reading audit: Research phase Oct 4, 2019
@jessicaschilling jessicaschilling changed the title Close-reading audit: Research phase Close-reading audit: Identification phase Oct 4, 2019
@jessicaschilling
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing, since @johnnymatthews' report is in issue #326!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
dif/easy Someone with a little familiarity can pick up effort/hours Estimated to take one or several hours topic/design-content Content design, writing, information architecture topic/docs Documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants