Thank you for improving this project! We value small, precise changes that solve real problems. We value incremental, detail‑first contributions over big rewrites or abstractions.
"Nobody should start to undertake a large project. You start with a small trivial project, and you should never expect it to get large. If you do, you'll just overdesign and generally think it is more important than it likely is at that stage. Or worse, you might be scared away by the sheer size of the work you envision. So start small, and think about the details. Don't think about some big picture and fancy design. If it doesn't solve some fairly immediate need, it's almost certainly over-designed. And don't expect people to jump in and help you. That's not how these things work. You need to get something half-way useful first, and then others will say "hey, that almost works for me", and they'll get involved in the project." — Linus Torvalds
-
Conventional Commits Follow https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/:
feat: …
for new featuresfix: …
for bug fixeschore: …
for maintenance
-
Logical Commits Group changes by purpose. It’s okay to have multiple commits in a PR, but if they’re mere checkpoints, squash them into a single logical commit.
-
Lint & Tests Run existing linters/formatters and ensure all tests pass.
- One logical change per PR.
- Rebase or squash before opening to keep history concise.
- Title & Description
- Title uses Conventional Commits style.
- Description explains what and why—keep context minimal.
- Search existing issues first.
- Provide a minimal reproducible example and clear steps.
We enforce quality via CI on every push and PR:
- Commitlint for commit‑message style
- Linters/Formatters
- Unit tests
Failures must be fixed before review.
- Please see
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
for behavioral expectations and reporting. - For quick questions or discussions, open an issue with the
discussion
label or mention a maintainer.
Thanks again for helping keep this project small, simple, and impactful!