You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, thank you for releasing your dataset.
I was looking through the lesion segmentation images and couldn't help but notice that many
ground truth images are completely black, even though the respective images contain obvious artifacts.
For example the below image clearly contains exudates but the corresponding exudate ground truth is an all black image.
This happens for many other images and lesion types as well.
Please let me know what you think
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The patch of lesions to the left of the macula look like drusen and not exudate to me (see [1]). Drusen were not part of the dataset so wouldn't be included in the annotations. There are a couple of microaneurysms in the photo which were tagged correctly. Do you have a list of images where you think the annotations are missing?
I'm not part of this research project, just interested in it's data quality.
First of all, thank you for releasing your dataset.
I was looking through the lesion segmentation images and couldn't help but notice that many
ground truth images are completely black, even though the respective images contain obvious artifacts.
For example the below image clearly contains exudates but the corresponding exudate ground truth is an all black image.

This happens for many other images and lesion types as well.
Please let me know what you think
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: