Skip to content

i don't think coupling db with bot client is a good idea #817

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
skyhee opened this issue Apr 10, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

i don't think coupling db with bot client is a good idea #817

skyhee opened this issue Apr 10, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@skyhee
Copy link

skyhee commented Apr 10, 2018

as saying up

@akalongman
Copy link
Member

Any suggestion? We are thinking make storage abstract, but its not so easy

@skyhee
Copy link
Author

skyhee commented May 22, 2018

u could even think of a way to implement the bot client without a db or storage。I don't need any storage In my business any way.

@akalongman
Copy link
Member

@skybebe you maybe not, but there are many people who asked for adding some storage layer

@jacklul
Copy link
Collaborator

jacklul commented May 23, 2018

I think it should be an optional plugin anyway, I eventually moved away from using it and implement own database handler in my projects...

@skyhee
Copy link
Author

skyhee commented Jun 9, 2018

yes, that's exactly what i mean. bot is bot , db is db, whether i need db or not. if i need db, i can configure it.
Maybe this is a better way

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants