-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
suggestion - add Frequency of question asked #99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Hey @NirmalSilwal!! Thanks for the suggestion - by "filter question by frequency", do you mean to sort questions based on how "popular" they are? I'm not sure our current data set supports that and I'd have to take a best guess on how to implement it. I think that one way could be to sort questions based on the number of companies that ask it but this changes all the time so it wouldn't be accurate! |
Hi @seanprashad to filter by frequency I mean to sort question based on how many companies have asked them. Let's say one question X is asked in 8 companies and another question Y in 5 companies. Then we can add that feature to sort by frequency where X occur first and Y after that. For your better reference this is the similar concept used in Leetcode frequency. I agree that those frequency changes all the times but as per this reference this is already not up-to date. So for whatever the list is there we can sort them by frequency. |
Gotcha @NirmalSilwal! |
Hey @NirmalSilwal - I wanted to let you know that this functionality was added in #104 by our friend @hiromik! You can simply left-click on the thanks-hiromik.mp4I'll consider this issue solved but please let me know if anything else pops up! Thank you! |
Can't find this option now... |
Hey @KashyapCKotak! This feature is working for me - would you be able to refresh your page and let us know if the issue still persists? It might be a bug we haven't discovered as yet! |
Hi @seanprashad, it would be great to filter question by frequency. This would be helpful to those people who are interviewing soon. What do you think about this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: