New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

slim 4 + slim-http 0.5 decorators #2531

Closed

sinitsa opened this issue Nov 1, 2018 · 1 comment

sinitsa commented Nov 1, 2018

Hello!
Now i'm using slim4 and slim psr7 implementation.. Today you have upgraded slim-http to decorators, very good update, thanks!

After upgrade i got errors in slim4 App.. If i understood right, now slim psr7 moved to slim/psr7, but composer couldn't find it..
Some modules of my system (stand-alone) using Guzzle implementation. Is it will be better, to move the entire system to Guzzle too, using new decorators?
How to do it right?)
Thanks in advance

Member

akrabat commented Nov 1, 2018

See PR PSR-7 Implementation Decoupling #2529 for where we're going. We're in flux at the moment on this branch.
It really doesn't matter and is up to you. There is no "right" here. Personally, I'd use Nyholm's PSR-7 implementation for my Slim app as I like it and then use Guzzle as an HTTP client within my actions.

akrabat closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment