You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Project Home carries the text
"Apple Core datasets will be expressible as Simple Darwin Core or as an
Occurrence core (http://rs.gbif.org/core/dwc_occurrence.xml) with an
Identification History extension
(http://rs.gbif.org/extension/dwc/identification.xml)."
Since "Simple Darwin Core" is an organizing principle, not a constraint set, is
the meaning of the first clause "will be expressible in a way that conforms to
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/simple/index.htm" or does it mean "will be
expressible in a way that conforms to either
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/xsd/tdwg_dwc_simple.xsd or
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/examples/text/example_text_simpledwc_complete.xml"
If the latter (which I hope is the case), it would be wise to specify a version
of each of those, or at least urge that serializations carry enough information
to know which.
If you mean the organizing principle thingie, you may open an unknown future
can of worms...
Original issue reported on code.google.com by morris.bob on 10 Oct 2011 at 5:12
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
morris.bob
on 10 Oct 2011 at 5:12The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: