Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How generic is the goal to meet "Simple Darwin Core" #36

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 14, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

How generic is the goal to meet "Simple Darwin Core" #36

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 14, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

The Project Home carries the text
"Apple Core datasets will be expressible as Simple Darwin Core or as an 
Occurrence core (http://rs.gbif.org/core/dwc_occurrence.xml) with an 
Identification History extension 
(http://rs.gbif.org/extension/dwc/identification.xml)."

Since "Simple Darwin Core" is an organizing principle, not a constraint set, is 
the meaning of the first clause "will be expressible in a way  that conforms to 
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/simple/index.htm" or does it mean "will be 
expressible in a way that conforms to either 
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/xsd/tdwg_dwc_simple.xsd or 
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/examples/text/example_text_simpledwc_complete.xml"

If the latter (which I hope is the case), it would be wise to specify a version 
of each of those, or at least urge that serializations carry enough information 
to know which.

If you mean the organizing principle thingie, you may open an unknown future 
can of worms...

Original issue reported on code.google.com by morris.bob on 10 Oct 2011 at 5:12

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant