Skip to content

train parameters #6

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
cellimnet opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

train parameters #6

cellimnet opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@cellimnet
Copy link

Hello:
(1)When training, i found it cannot work when i set auc_roc as the ref_metric.
(2)What model_name do you finally use or recommand?
Thanks for your answering.

@trislaz
Copy link
Owner

trislaz commented Aug 11, 2023

Hello,
(1) Are you performing a multilabel classification ?
(2) I would recommend using the default i.e. mhmc_layers with n_layers_classif = 3. ensembling seem to have its importance also, i found the sweet spot that optimizes computation time and performances is around rep=3, n_ensemble=3.
Do not hesitate to increase nb_tiles also!

@cellimnet
Copy link
Author

Hello:
(1) No, I just want to see the impact of different metrics on performance.
(2) Thank you for your valuable advice!

@trislaz
Copy link
Owner

trislaz commented Aug 12, 2023

Hello, 1) ok I'll look into this issue on monday!
2) you are welcome !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants