Skip to content

Lut generation and schema search #49

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 52 commits into
base: LUT-generation-and-schema-search
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

srikanth-iyer
Copy link
Collaborator

added schema search rules, sample automata rules, tests, input symmetry for anni_gen in BooleanNode among others.

@fcphysics if you have time, i'll be happy to go through the changes with you. Please let me know if you can review these changes. I need them on the casci repo because some of the functions will be used in the noisy cellular automata GA.

@jcrozum also adding you here. I'm assuming that you're busy settling in, but in case you have time to check the code, please let me know. I'd love your input.

And sorry for the big pull request.

srikanth-iyer and others added 30 commits July 2, 2024 16:46
@srikanth-iyer srikanth-iyer marked this pull request as draft July 29, 2024 00:05
@srikanth-iyer srikanth-iyer marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2024 00:07
@srikanth-iyer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@fcphysics Can you have a look at this pull request please? I've added Ke for anni_gen rules as well in this

"""
generated_node = None
closest_node = None
closest_ke = None
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are those initial settings of the parameters to "None" necessary? Because it might make debugging more difficult later.

Copy link
Contributor

@fcphysics fcphysics left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job @srikanth-iyer, those are necessary improvements.
Would you mind adding a description/disclaimer on the README file about what is in the automata folder?
This is because "automata" is more general than "boolean_node" in the sense that it could take more states. However, this is not what the code considers. We are still in the "boolean realm", but we are interested in specific features focusing on annihilation and generation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants