Skip to content

Super ultrawide support #518

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

NIronwolf
Copy link

Adds some additional narrower width percentage selections to get a narrower compact view on super ultra-wide monitors (32:9) that is comparable to the widths that the existing list makes on standard 16:9 monitors.

Note: I'm not positive increasing the minimal_width in the style is the best solution, but without the change the scroll bar makes all the added choices get an ellipsis and not show the whole number.

Change minimum width since additional selections cause a scroll bar.
Add additional narrower selections for width percentage for super ultra-wide monitors (32:9)
@ClaudeMetz
Copy link
Owner

Ah this probably makes sense. I think it should only be jumps of 2 percent though for the new numbers, just like the old ones. That'll be precise enough.

I'll have a look at the styling issue, it's probably the way to go for that weird interaction.

@NIronwolf
Copy link
Author

I went to 1 steps, because being double wide, it makes the same amount of "pixels" per step. :)

@ClaudeMetz
Copy link
Owner

Yeah but still, it's just too many I feel.

@NIronwolf
Copy link
Author

Should I work up a more complicated patch with a setting that let's you pick your monitor type and presents a halved valve list and is back to not needing to scroll?

@ClaudeMetz
Copy link
Owner

Nah no need to overcomplicate it I think, just do steps of 2 for everyone and it'll be fiiine.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants