Preparations of some tables to migrate

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

Preparations for the database migration to another system.

• destination database has already data

• some of the data in the source and destination is the same. e.g. the same user, defined by its email is in both, then the user_id from the source has to be mapped to the user_id of the destination and all the references need to be kept

• final user should not do anything

• is there any other resource (like users) that can be repeated? I guess products, ... check which are missing

• basic ideas (by @sanderegg )

  • audit all the tables to check which ones are problematic
  • from a first overview: UserID and GroupID and WalletID cannot be changed to UUID because they are already in the interface (publicAPI and/or webAPI and/or legacy services)
  • then some integer IDs might just be transformed
  • WalletID is a "non-problem" as there are no wallets in osparc.io

• thoughts

  • so i believe we need to identify what concepts could be repeated in the destination database and how to define "equal" in that sense e.g. two users are equal when the have the same email
  • well the idea here would be ideally to upsert osparc.io DB into sim4life.io

Related issue/s

• move of osparc.io: make db tables ready for merging osparc-issues#1867

How to test

Dev-ops

None

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.44%. Comparing base (4cf8ef1) to head (cad45da).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7477      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.75%   89.44%   +1.69%     
==========================================
  Files        1784     1515     -269     
  Lines       68856    59753    -9103     
  Branches     1133      531     -602     
==========================================
- Hits        60422    53447    -6975     
+ Misses       8122     6163    -1959     
+ Partials      312      143     -169     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.97% <ø> (-0.07%)	⬇️
unittests	88.56% <60.00%> (+1.61%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	92.79% <ø> (ø)
pkg_notifications_library	85.26% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	88.27% <60.00%> (-0.14%)	⬇️
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.66% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
agent	96.46% <ø> (ø)
api_server	92.74% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.08% <ø> (ø)
catalog	92.64% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.25% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.30% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	98.12% <ø> (ø)
director	76.89% <ø> (+0.09%)	⬆️
director_v2	91.13% <ø> (-0.08%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	97.40% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	90.15% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	89.79% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.28% <ø> (ø)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.12% <ø> (-0.11%)	⬇️
storage	87.56% <ø> (+0.07%)	⬆️
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	86.03% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4cf8ef1...cad45da. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud