Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update wrong clause #9454

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

fix: update wrong clause #9454

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

jgomer2001
Copy link
Contributor

Prepare


Description

Target issue

closes #9181

Implementation Details


Test and Document the changes

  • Static code analysis has been run locally and issues have been fixed
  • Relevant unit and integration tests have been added/updated
  • Relevant documentation has been updated if any (i.e. user guides, installation and configuration guides, technical design docs etc)

Please check the below before submitting your PR. The PR will not be merged if there are no commits that start with docs: to indicate documentation changes or if the below checklist is not selected.

  • I confirm that there is no impact on the docs due to the code changes in this PR.

Signed-off-by: jgomer2001 <bonustrack310@gmail.com>
Copy link

dryrunsecurity bot commented Sep 10, 2024

DryRun Security Summary

The pull request focuses on improving the Agama authentication flow in the Janssen Project application, including updating the extractAgamaFlow function, handling cases where the userId is not present, and following good security practices such as encrypting the inum and using the AuthenticationService to authenticate users.

Expand for full summary

Summary:

The changes in this pull request appear to be focused on improving the Agama authentication flow in the Janssen Project application. The key changes include:

  1. Updating the extractAgamaFlow function to correctly identify the Agama flow based on the acr parameter.
  2. Handling the case where the userId is not present in the flow result, ensuring that the code does not attempt to authenticate the user in this scenario.

From a security perspective, the code seems to be well-designed and follows good security practices, such as:

  1. Encrypting the inum (internal user number) before storing it in the session data.
  2. Implementing checks to ensure that there is a single matching user based on the finish_userid_db_attr attribute, and setting an error message if there are multiple matches or no matches.
  3. Using the AuthenticationService to authenticate the user by their inum, which is a standard and secure way of authenticating users in the application.

Overall, the changes in this pull request appear to be a positive improvement to the Agama authentication flow, with a focus on enhancing security and addressing potential issues.

Files Changed:

  • docs/script-catalog/person_authentication/agama-bridge/AgamaBridge.py: This file contains the changes related to the Agama authentication flow. The key changes include updating the extractAgamaFlow function to correctly identify the Agama flow, and handling the case where the userId is not present in the flow result.

Code Analysis

We ran 9 analyzers against 1 file and 0 analyzers had findings. 9 analyzers had no findings.

Riskiness

🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded.

View PR in the DryRun Dashboard.

@mo-auto mo-auto added the kind-bug Issue or PR is a bug in existing functionality label Sep 10, 2024
@mo-auto mo-auto enabled auto-merge (squash) September 10, 2024 21:34
@mo-auto mo-auto merged commit 9ec8afc into main Sep 11, 2024
11 checks passed
@mo-auto mo-auto deleted the agama-issue_9181_1 branch September 11, 2024 02:32
yuriyz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
fix: update wrong clause #9181

Signed-off-by: jgomer2001 <bonustrack310@gmail.com>
Former-commit-id: 9ec8afc
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind-bug Issue or PR is a bug in existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

chore(agama): bridge refactoring
3 participants