Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update main.yml #251

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update main.yml #251

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ChandraDevs1
Copy link
Contributor

@ChandraDevs1 ChandraDevs1 commented Mar 5, 2025

github.ref ensures that the cache key is consistent across multiple commits on the same branch, which helps in reusing the cache more effectively. This improves the performance of the workflow by avoiding redundant work

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced internal caching for documentation builds to improve process efficiency and performance.

github.ref ensures that the cache key is consistent across multiple commits on the same branch, which helps in reusing the cache more effectively. This improves the performance of the workflow by avoiding redundant work
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 5, 2025

Walkthrough

The update changes the cache key for the "build-sphinx" job in the GitHub Actions workflow. Instead of using the commit SHA, the key now relies on the branch or tag reference. This adjustment alters how cache data is stored and retrieved during workflow runs. No modifications were made to any public or exported entities.

Changes

File(s) Summary
.github/workflows/main.yml Updated cache key from commit SHA to branch/tag reference for the build-sphinx job.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant W as GitHub Actions Workflow
    participant R as Repository (Branch/Tag)
    participant C as Cache Service

    W->>R: Retrieve branch/tag reference
    R-->>W: Return branch/tag name
    W->>C: Request cache using branch/tag key
    C-->>W: Return cache hit/miss response
Loading

Poem

I'm just a little rabbit with a curious code,
Hopping on branches down the workflow road.
Cache keys now sprout from branches, not a single commit,
In this new garden of change, everything's neatly knit.
Springing through the code, my paws tap to a joyful beat.
🐇✨


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/main.yml (1)

27-27: Cache Key Update Using github.ref
The change from using github.sha to github.ref for the cache key is well-aligned with the PR objective. This modification ensures that the cache remains consistent across multiple commits on the same branch, thereby enhancing cache reuse and workflow performance.

Suggestion: Consider adding an inline comment explaining why github.ref is used for the cache key. This will aid future maintainers in understanding the rationale behind this change.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f46002a and b9e6cb8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build-sphinx

@ChandraDevs1 ChandraDevs1 deleted the patch-1 branch March 6, 2025 15:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant