-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using COMBO in BoTorch #1
Comments
Hi, Kusti.
Thanks for your suggestion.
Your comment on the parts need to be ported is more and less right.
There is no specific reason for not using GPyTorch.
I just extended the implementation I had previously because I wanted to
have more control over my code.
I will check whether there is an issue in doing this on my side.
Thanks.
Changyong Oh
…On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 2:59 PM Kusti Skytén ***@***.***> wrote:
At the moment COMBO is packaged like an application for demonstrating the
algorithm for the paper. It would be really useful to be able to use COMBO
in BoTorch <https://www.botorch.org/>. It seems like COMBO has its own
implementation of Gaussian processes on top of PyTorch. Is there some
specific reason for not using GPyTorch <https://gpytorch.ai/>? From a
cursory overview of the code it looks like the important parts are the
custom kernel and acquisition function implementations. The rest can
possibly be replaced with GPyTorch and BoTorch. Not only would this make
the codebase smaller and easier to understand, it would also make it easier
to use the algorithm in Ax <https://ax.dev/>, which is a user-friendly
platform for running adaptive experiments.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABJKCMGMENWS7RJLZ4UE77TQSATDJA5CNFSM4JIT6JG2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4HWTMWBA>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABJKCMC37YQHOICKFNLZ6CDQSATDJANCNFSM4JIT6JGQ>
.
|
Eytan from the BoTorch team here. I was just checking out COMBO—it would be great to have COMBO in BoTorch/Ax, as handling of categorical inputs is a commonly requested feature. Feel free to open an issue on the BoTorch repo if you need help. BoTorch has a good deal of utility functions that make fitting and optimizing acquisition functions on GPyTorch more numerically stable for the small data regime, so I’d highly recommend working off our tutorials to use the full suite of utilities available. |
At the moment COMBO is packaged like an application for demonstrating the algorithm for the paper. It would be really useful to be able to use COMBO in BoTorch. It seems like COMBO has its own implementation of Gaussian processes on top of PyTorch. Is there some specific reason for not using GPyTorch? From a cursory overview of the code it looks like the important parts are the custom kernel and acquisition function implementations. The rest can possibly be replaced with GPyTorch and BoTorch. Not only would this make the codebase smaller and easier to understand, it would also make it easier to use the algorithm in Ax, which is a user-friendly platform for running adaptive experiments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: