fix: adjust flex styles in NavigationHeader layout

[lawvs]

Resolve FOL-1773

Refine the flex styles in the NavigationHeader component to improve layout consistency and responsiveness.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
follow	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Mar 26, 2025 1:23pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
follow-external-ssr	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Mar 26, 2025 1:23pm

[linear]

FOL-1773 Header Title Overflow

[follow-reviewer-bot]

Suggested PR Title:

fix(header): improve layout responsiveness of NavigationHeader

Change Summary:
Updated NavigationHeader layout for improved responsiveness. Changed flex properties to ensure better alignment of child components in left, center, and right sections of the header.

Code Review:

Code Review

File: apps/mobile/src/components/layouts/header/NavigationHeader.tsx

1. Line 258:
   The change from className="flex-1 flex-row items-center justify-start" to className="flex flex-row items-center justify-start" is problematic. The previous flex-1 class ensures the View occupies proportional space in its parent container. Removing flex-1 could lead to layout issues if this View is intended to scale based on its parent container. It is advisable to retain flex-1 unless there is a specific reason for its removal and sufficient testing has validated the new behavior.

2. Line 268:
   The addition of flex-1 alongside truncate in the className of the Animated.View may cause unintended layout behavior. While truncate is meant to handle text overflow gracefully, combining it with flex-1 could interfere with layout constraints regarding text content. This change needs to be revisited, and it should be confirmed that the styles applied will not conflict with Animated.View intended behavior across different screen sizes.

3. Line 279:
   The change from flex flex-1 shrink-0 flex-row items-center justify-end to flex shrink-0 flex-row items-center justify-end removes flex-1, which may affect the distribution of space within this layout component. Similar to Line 258, flex-1 ensures proportional space allocation, and its removal could lead to layout inconsistencies if this View is expected to take up proportional width. Retain flex-1 unless a clear requirement justifies its removal.

---

Summary

The removal of flex-1 in multiple instances requires further analysis and justification, as it may alter the proportional space distribution within the layout that could result in unintended UI issues.

Change Requests

• Line 258: Revert flex to flex-1 unless layout testing has validated the new structure.
• Line 268: Double-check the interaction between flex-1 and truncate to ensure no layout constraints are being violated.
• Line 279: Revert flex to flex-1 unless removal is confirmed necessary and tested adequately.

Ensure these changes are resolved before merging.

[Innei]

title Not centered on the X axis of the entire screen

[Innei]

The title should be centered on the screen, if space permits.