TST: updating tests for vizier changes #665
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #665 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 82.97% 82.97%
=======================================
Files 75 75
Lines 7759 7759
=======================================
Hits 6438 6438
Misses 1321 1321 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Thanks! The doi thing rings a bell (something to do with the data provenance ivoa note), but I'll still check with VizieR's dev before we merge this |
ManonMarchand
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cron was failing with these legitimately looking upstream changes. I'm not 100% though if the bibcode removal is intended, so certainly will need @ManonMarchand's review.