Skip to content

feat(attestation): update contracts on attestation init #1974

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Apr 29, 2025

Conversation

jiparis
Copy link
Member

@jiparis jiparis commented Apr 11, 2025

Previously the --contract argument in att init was used only in the case the workflow must be created. With this change, the contract is always updated, no matter if the workflow is new or not.
Chainloop takes care of the actual update happening only if there are changes in the contract content.

Fixes #1694

jiparis added 2 commits April 11, 2025 15:59
Signed-off-by: Jose I. Paris <jiparis@chainloop.dev>
Signed-off-by: Jose I. Paris <jiparis@chainloop.dev>
@jiparis jiparis requested review from migmartri and javirln April 11, 2025 14:41
jiparis added 2 commits April 11, 2025 16:50
Signed-off-by: Jose I. Paris <jiparis@chainloop.dev>
Signed-off-by: Jose I. Paris <jiparis@chainloop.dev>
Copy link
Member

@migmartri migmartri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I find this code difficult to follow.

The way I see this is

  • You provide a contractRef
    • no -> done
    • yes: It can be two things
      • a file or URL
        • Load the content of the file or URL
        • Check if the workflow exists
          • yes? -> update the contract (the associated one) with new content
          • no? -> create a default contract with content
      • an existing (or not) contract name -> just pass the reference to the att init create.

jiparis added 3 commits April 24, 2025 15:33
Signed-off-by: Jose I. Paris <jiparis@chainloop.dev>
Signed-off-by: Jose I. Paris <jiparis@chainloop.dev>
@jiparis
Copy link
Member Author

jiparis commented Apr 24, 2025

I've refactored it, please take a look

jiparis added 3 commits April 29, 2025 11:14
Signed-off-by: Jose I. Paris <jiparis@chainloop.dev>
Signed-off-by: Jose I. Paris <jiparis@chainloop.dev>
@jiparis jiparis merged commit 5a3ccd9 into chainloop-dev:main Apr 29, 2025
13 checks passed
@jiparis jiparis deleted the 1694-contract-update branch April 29, 2025 12:29
migmartri added a commit to migmartri/chainloop that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
migmartri added a commit to migmartri/chainloop that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
…nloop-dev#1974)"

This reverts commit 5a3ccd9.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Martinez <miguel@chainloop.dev>
migmartri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
…" (#2017)

Signed-off-by: Miguel Martinez <miguel@chainloop.dev>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

confusing behavior att init --contract
3 participants