move footnotes on divisive language to exactly where divisive language is used

[krumelmonster]

My commit is not signed or using a realname but I don't believe that the changes I've made can be subject to copyright.

What type of PR is this?

/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

I got a bit confused when reading the manpage as the footnote on problematic and divisive language appeared after a sentence that doesn't use problematic and divisive language and I think moving the footnote to just after the wording deemed problematic makes the manpage more readable

How to verify it

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

None

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: krumelmonster
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign giuseppe for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[TomSweeneyRedHat]

@krumelmonster nice change! Unfortunately our CI won't take a PR unless it's signed. Can you do a git commit --amend -s and then also add [CI:DOCS] to the title. That tag will bypass a lot of testing that's not needed for a documentation submission like this one. Then do git fetch, rebase and push and it should be GTG.

LGTM other than the CI unhappiness.

[edsantiago]

@TomSweeneyRedHat see containers/podman#20983

I'm working on that on the podman side, and I can take this one on as well with @krumelmonster's permission.

[krumelmonster]

Thank you for picking it up @edsantiago! I really like podman and buildah for being tools that can be understood based on documentation and manpage

@TomSweeneyRedHat I knew I could sign it but I was insecure whether a signature with a non-legal name would be frowned upon. I take your comment as an invitation to make pull requests in the future under the name krumelmonster with which I'm active in OSS; it is very appreciated.

[TomSweeneyRedHat]

Works for me @krumelmonster , thanks!