Skip to content

Move to -Svc pool provider (7.0 RC1) #43528

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

MattGal
Copy link
Member

@MattGal MattGal commented Aug 24, 2022

{PR title}

  • You've read the Contributor Guide and Code of Conduct.
  • You've included unit or integration tests for your change, where applicable.
  • You've included inline docs for your change, where applicable.
  • There's an open issue for the PR that you are making. If you'd like to propose a new feature or change, please open an issue to discuss the change or find an existing issue.

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

Description

Moves pool providers for release branch to a -Svc pool, outside of daily, main-branch quotas.

Fixes #{bug number} (in this specific format)

@MattGal MattGal requested review from a team, dougbu and wtgodbe as code owners August 24, 2022 22:00
@ghost ghost added the area-infrastructure Includes: MSBuild projects/targets, build scripts, CI, Installers and shared framework label Aug 24, 2022
@dougbu
Copy link
Contributor

dougbu commented Aug 24, 2022

@MattGal aren't we close enough to the close of RC1 that not using -Svc pools for this prerelease branch is Just Fine:tm:❔

In any case, we need at most one of this PR or #43529. Either we don't need this PR or the final commit will automatically be taken forward into release/7.0.

@MattGal
Copy link
Member Author

MattGal commented Aug 25, 2022

@MattGal aren't we close enough to the close of RC1 that not using -Svc pools for this prerelease branch is Just Fine™️❔

In any case, we need at most one of this PR or #43529. Either we don't need this PR or the final commit will automatically be taken forward into release/7.0.

I won't be hurt if you just close it, I blasted out a bunch of PRs just now to try to move off repos that had built a "release" named branch in the last week. So, if it's not useful, just close it; I don't necessarily know all the branches that matter.

@dougbu
Copy link
Contributor

dougbu commented Aug 25, 2022

Closing in favour of #43529. Thanks @MattGal

@dougbu dougbu closed this Aug 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-infrastructure Includes: MSBuild projects/targets, build scripts, CI, Installers and shared framework
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants