Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/9.0] Rename IncludeRootDiscriminatorInJsonId to HasRootDiscriminatorInJsonId #34717

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2024

Conversation

roji
Copy link
Member

@roji roji commented Sep 19, 2024

Description

9.0 introduced two new APIs for Cosmos: IncludeDiscriminatorInJsonId and IncludeRootDiscriminatorInJsonId. We later decided to change the name, but #34403 only renamed IncludeDiscriminatorInJsonId to HasDiscriminatorInJsonId, and left IncludeRootDiscriminatorInJsonId as-is. This PR fixes that.

Customer impact

None - this is a new, unreleased API in 9.0.

How found

Discovered while writing documentation.

Regression

No.

Testing

Non required.

Risk

None, method name change only.

@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Sep 19, 2024

/cc @artl93

Copy link
Member

@artl93 artl93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please follow-up for breaking change notifications as appropriate.

@artl93
Copy link
Member

artl93 commented Sep 19, 2024

@AndriySvyryd - please flow through tactics. We just met and I shouldn't have marked this approved.

@AndriySvyryd AndriySvyryd changed the title [released/9.0] Rename IncludeRootDiscriminatorInJsonId to HasRootDiscriminatorInJsonId [release/9.0] Rename IncludeRootDiscriminatorInJsonId to HasRootDiscriminatorInJsonId Sep 19, 2024
@roji roji merged commit a89537e into dotnet:release/9.0 Sep 20, 2024
7 checks passed
@roji roji deleted the RenameCosmosApi branch September 20, 2024 10:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants