Skip to content

New job #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024
Merged

New job #5

merged 18 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

rozyczko
Copy link
Member

@rozyczko rozyczko commented Jun 3, 2024

Virtual classes for the new job and relevant other things.

Also, changes to the lmfit wrapper fixing circular dependencies.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This pull request does not contain a valid label. Please add one of the following labels: ['chore', 'fix', 'bugfix', 'bug', 'enhancement', 'feature', 'dependencies', 'documentation']

@rozyczko rozyczko changed the base branch from master to develop July 31, 2024 07:29
@rozyczko rozyczko added the [scope] enhancement Adds/improves features (major.MINOR.patch) label Aug 5, 2024
@rozyczko rozyczko marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2024 07:32
def calculate_theory(self, *args, **kwargs):
raise NotImplementedError("calculate_theory not implemented")
#pass
# @abstractmethod
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be deleted?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The summary/info abstract classes will be added later, so I left the code for future reuse.
The calculate_theory abstract method should not be commented out. Fixed.


from easyscience.Datasets.xarray import xr # type: ignore
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we not moving away from xarray?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are, but conversion to scipp in libraries will be done gradually. I could remove the dependency on xarray in EasyScience, though, by deleting type hints.

@rozyczko rozyczko merged commit 0f372e5 into develop Aug 6, 2024
26 checks passed
@rozyczko rozyczko deleted the new_job branch August 6, 2024 09:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[scope] enhancement Adds/improves features (major.MINOR.patch)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants