Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 8, 2020. It is now read-only.

Add an option to OnDiskRepoTestCase.repo!/1 to override initial config file content. #301

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2020

Conversation

scouten
Copy link
Collaborator

@scouten scouten commented Feb 9, 2020

Changes in This Pull Request

This change allows test code to specific known, non-default starting content for the newly-constructed repo.

Checklist

  • This PR represents a single feature, fix, or change.
  • All applicable changes have been documented.
  • There is test coverage for all changes. n/a (test code)
  • All cases where a literal value is returned use the cover macro to force code coverage. n/a
  • Any code ported from jgit maintains all existing copyright and license notices. n/a
  • If new files are ported from jgit, the path to the corresponding file(s) is included in the header comment. n/a
  • Any TO DO items (or similar) have been entered as GitHub issues and the link to that issue has been included in a comment. n/a

@scouten scouten self-assigned this Feb 9, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #301 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #301   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files          30     30           
  Lines        1643   1643           
=====================================
  Hits         1643   1643

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ed632a6...cb06a1c. Read the comment docs.

@scouten scouten merged commit d57e16b into master Feb 9, 2020
@scouten scouten deleted the on_disk_repo_test_case+opts branch February 9, 2020 22:11
scouten added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2020
…302)

Turns out the interface introduced in #301 didn't work well. Fixed. (I hope.)
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant