Skip to content

Explain deprecation of service/provider format #241

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2018

Conversation

jaredbeck
Copy link
Contributor

This deprecation message will be shown to normal people who
know nothing about this issue, so it's important that we give
them enough information.

This deprecation message will be shown to normal people who
know nothing about this issue, so it's important that we give
them enough information.
@jaredbeck
Copy link
Contributor Author

This deprecation message will be shown to normal people who know nothing about this issue ..

He said, describing himself 😁

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 76.034% when pulling 3b3dd7c on jaredbeck:svc_prov_deprec into eb7ecd4 on fog:master.

@plribeiro3000
Copy link
Member

LGTM!

@plribeiro3000 plribeiro3000 merged commit 49235a5 into fog:master Sep 5, 2018
@jaredbeck jaredbeck deleted the svc_prov_deprec branch September 5, 2018 18:32
@geemus
Copy link
Member

geemus commented Sep 5, 2018

Thanks!

stanhu added a commit to stanhu/fog-google that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2025
This is needed to support fog-core 2.2 and up due to this change:
fog/fog-core#241
stanhu added a commit to stanhu/fog-google that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2025
This is needed to support fog-core 2.2 and up due to this change:
fog/fog-core#241
stanhu added a commit to stanhu/fog-google that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2025
This is needed to support fog-core 2.2 and up due to this change:
fog/fog-core#241
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants