Skip to content

Clean code improvements #3107

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

norri
Copy link
Contributor

@norri norri commented May 13, 2025

Update dependencies and fix errors found by Golangci-lint

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated naming conventions for improved clarity and consistency across configuration, database, and service components.
    • Adjusted function and method signatures for better encapsulation and type safety.
    • Enhanced error handling and logging for server and database initialization.
  • Tests
    • Improved test robustness by enforcing immediate failure on errors and enhancing assertion clarity.
    • Updated test mocks and helper functions for consistency with refactored code.
  • Style
    • Added missing punctuation to comments for improved documentation quality.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 13, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

This update refactors several internal types from exported to unexported, renames various mock and implementation structs for clarity, and adjusts function signatures to return concrete types instead of interfaces. It also improves test robustness by enforcing stricter error handling and updates comments for consistency. Minor Dockerfile and logging changes are included.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
clean-code/Dockerfile-local Changed base image from golang:1.24 to golang:1.23.3.
clean-code/app/config.go, clean-code/app/config_test.go, clean-code/app/main.go Renamed Configuration struct and constructor to unexported; updated usages in main and tests.
clean-code/app/datasources/database/db.go, memory_db.go, postgres_db.go Changed constructors to return concrete types instead of interfaces; introduced DB wrapper struct and ErrUnsupportedDatabase; updated error handling and comments.
clean-code/app/datasources/database/db_mock.go, server/services/books_mock.go Renamed mocks to MockDatabase/MockBooksService; updated method receivers and type assertions.
clean-code/app/datasources/database/db_test.go, memory_db_test.go, postgres_db_test.go Updated assertions to use require.NoError for stricter error checking; improved helper functions and assertion clarity.
clean-code/app/datasources/data_sources.go, server/domain/books.go, server/domain/errors.go, server/handlers/books.go Added missing periods to comments for consistency.
clean-code/app/server/server.go, server/server_test.go Changed NewServer to remove context argument; updated tests and usages accordingly.
clean-code/app/server/handlers/books_test.go Renamed mocks, used HTTP constants, enforced error handling with require.NoError, and improved resource cleanup in tests.
clean-code/app/server/services/books.go, books_test.go Renamed implementation struct to DefaultBooksService, updated constructor and receiver types, and improved test assertions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Main
    participant Config
    participant Database
    participant Server

    Main->>Config: newConfiguration()
    Main->>Database: NewDatabase(ctx, databaseURL)
    Database->>Database: Return *DB (wraps concrete Database)
    Main->>Server: NewServer(dataSources)
    Server->>Server: Register routes and handlers
    Main->>Server: app.Listen()
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🧹 Updates

Suggested reviewers

  • ReneWerner87

Poem

In the warren of code, a rabbit hops,
Tidying structs and cleaning up mocks.
With stricter tests and comments neat,
Each function’s name now feels complete.
Docker’s flavor takes a slight turn,
While errors are caught at every concern.
🐇✨—Onward to code that’s crisp and sweet!
"""

Tip

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
  • CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.

Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3367888 and cc76f6a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • clean-code/app/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum, !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • clean-code/app/config_test.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • clean-code/app/config_test.go
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/memory_db.go (1)

8-8: Consider whether initial capacity is needed.

The capacity hint was removed from the slice initialization. While this isn't a functional issue, if you expect the records slice to grow to a known size, providing an initial capacity can be more efficient by reducing reallocations.

-		records:   make([]Book, 0),
+		records:   make([]Book, 0, 10),
clean-code/app/config_test.go (1)

29-29: Consider removing unnecessary deferred cleanup

Since t.Setenv() on line 28 already handles the cleanup automatically, this defer os.Unsetenv("TEST_ENV") is redundant and can be removed.

- defer os.Unsetenv("TEST_ENV")
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2ff4f2a and 3367888.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • clean-code/app/go.mod is excluded by !**/*.mod
  • clean-code/app/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum, !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
  • clean-code/Dockerfile-local (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/config.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/config_test.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/datasources/data_sources.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/datasources/database/db.go (2 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/datasources/database/db_mock.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/datasources/database/db_test.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/datasources/database/memory_db.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/datasources/database/memory_db_test.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/datasources/database/postgres_db.go (4 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/datasources/database/postgres_db_test.go (5 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/main.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/server/domain/books.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/server/domain/errors.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/server/handlers/books.go (2 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/server/handlers/books_test.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/server/server.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/server/server_test.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/server/services/books.go (2 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/server/services/books_mock.go (1 hunks)
  • clean-code/app/server/services/books_test.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/memory_db.go (2)
Learnt from: norri
PR: gofiber/recipes#2701
File: clean-code/app/datasources/database/memory_db.go:18-20
Timestamp: 2024-11-25T19:31:36.658Z
Learning: In `clean-code/app/datasources/database/memory_db.go`, the `memoryDB` implementation is intended as an example and not for production use.
Learnt from: norri
PR: gofiber/recipes#2701
File: clean-code/app/datasources/database/memory_db.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-25T19:31:39.216Z
Learning: The `memoryDB` implementation in `clean-code/app/datasources/database/memory_db.go` is not intended for production use, so input validation, concurrency protection, and context usage are not required in this file.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (8)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/db_test.go (1)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/db.go (3)
  • NewDatabase (38-55)
  • Book (14-17)
  • NewBook (20-22)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/postgres_db_test.go (1)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/db.go (1)
  • NewBook (20-22)
clean-code/app/main.go (3)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/db.go (2)
  • NewDatabase (38-55)
  • DB (57-59)
clean-code/app/server/server.go (1)
  • NewServer (12-23)
clean-code/app/datasources/data_sources.go (1)
  • DataSources (7-9)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/memory_db.go (1)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/db.go (1)
  • Book (14-17)
clean-code/app/server/server.go (1)
clean-code/app/datasources/data_sources.go (1)
  • DataSources (7-9)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/memory_db_test.go (1)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/db.go (1)
  • NewBook (20-22)
clean-code/app/server/services/books.go (2)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/db.go (2)
  • Database (26-35)
  • Book (14-17)
clean-code/app/server/domain/books.go (1)
  • Book (4-6)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/db_mock.go (2)
clean-code/app/datasources/database/db.go (2)
  • Book (14-17)
  • NewBook (20-22)
clean-code/app/server/domain/books.go (1)
  • Book (4-6)
🔇 Additional comments (69)
clean-code/app/server/domain/errors.go (1)

3-3: Good documentation improvement.

Adding the period at the end of the comment improves consistency in the codebase documentation style.

clean-code/app/config.go (3)

8-8: Improved encapsulation by making configuration unexported.

Changing from exported Configuration to unexported configuration is a good practice as it restricts access to this type from outside the package, reducing the public API surface.


13-13: Appropriate constructor visibility change.

Making the constructor unexported (newConfiguration) aligns with the unexported type it creates, maintaining consistent encapsulation.


18-18: Return type updated to match renamed struct.

This change correctly updates the return type to match the renamed struct.

clean-code/Dockerfile-local (1)

1-1:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify Go version downgrade intention.

The Go version has been downgraded from 1.24 to 1.23.3. While 1.23.3 is a stable release, ensure this downgrade is intentional and compatible with your codebase requirements.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if any Go code in the repo uses features from Go 1.24 that aren't in 1.23
echo "Checking for potential Go 1.24 features that might not be compatible with 1.23.3..."
rg -l 'go1\.24' --type go || echo "No explicit Go 1.24 references found"

# Check the go.mod file to see the required Go version
echo -e "\nChecking go.mod for Go version requirement:"
cat app/go.mod | grep -E '^go\s+[0-9]+\.[0-9]+' || echo "No explicit Go version requirement found in go.mod"

Length of output: 594


Let’s locate any go.mod files and check the Go version requirement:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
echo "Searching for go.mod files..."
find . -maxdepth 4 -type f -name 'go.mod'

echo -e "\nInspecting Go version line in each go.mod:"
while IFS= read -r f; do
  echo "In $f:"
  grep -E '^go\s+[0-9]+\.[0-9]+' "$f" || echo "  No explicit Go version found"
done < <(find . -maxdepth 4 -type f -name 'go.mod')

Length of output: 363


Let’s remove the depth limit and search the entire repo for any go.mod and inspect its Go version:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
echo "Locating all go.mod files in the repo..."
find . -type f -name 'go.mod' -print

echo -e "\nChecking Go version in each go.mod:"
find . -type f -name 'go.mod' -exec sh -c '
  for f; do
    echo "In $f:"
    grep -E "^go\s+[0-9]+\.[0-9]+" "$f" || echo "  No explicit Go version found"
  done
' sh {} +

Length of output: 388


Verify Go version downgrade is intentional and compatible
It looks like you’ve moved the base image from golang:1.24 to golang:1.23.3. Our checks didn’t find:

  • Any go.mod files in the repo (so no module‐declared Go version)
  • Any explicit “go1.24” references in the source

Please confirm that:

  • None of your code or dependencies rely on Go 1.24-only features
  • All tests and builds still pass under Go 1.23.3
clean-code/app/datasources/data_sources.go (1)

5-6: Improved documentation clarity.

The updated comment adds a period for consistency and a new line explaining the purpose of the DataSources struct, which improves code documentation quality.

clean-code/app/server/handlers/books.go (3)

12-12: Good documentation improvement.

Adding periods at the end of comments aligns with the consistent documentation style throughout the codebase.


27-27: Good documentation improvement.

Adding periods at the end of comments maintains consistency in the documentation style.


35-35: Good production reminder comment.

This is a useful reminder for future developers that proper validation should be implemented in production code.

clean-code/app/server/domain/books.go (2)

3-3: Good documentation improvement.

Adding periods at the end of comments ensures consistent documentation style.


8-8: Good documentation improvement.

Consistent punctuation in comments improves readability and maintains a standardized style.

clean-code/app/datasources/database/memory_db.go (1)

5-6: Good return type change for better clarity.

Changing the return type from an interface to a concrete type (*memoryDB) makes the code more explicit and easier to understand. This follows the "return concrete types, accept interfaces" design principle.

clean-code/app/server/server_test.go (7)

5-5: Good import specificity.

Using a specific import for the HTTP methods is a good practice.


12-12: Good addition of require package.

Adding the require package allows for better error handling in tests.


16-16: Clean function call without unnecessary context parameter.

Removing the context parameter aligns with the updated NewServer function signature, making the code cleaner.


18-18: Good use of HTTP method constant.

Using http.MethodGet instead of the string literal "GET" is more idiomatic Go and improves maintainability.


19-19: Improved error handling in tests.

Using require.NoError instead of assert.Nil for error checking is better as it fails immediately rather than continuing the test when an error occurs.


21-21: Good resource management.

Adding defer resp.Body.Close() ensures proper cleanup of resources, preventing potential resource leaks.


24-24: Consistent error handling approach.

Using require.NoError consistently for all error checks in the test maintains a uniform error handling pattern.

clean-code/app/main.go (4)

16-16: Reflects visibility change to the configuration function

The change from NewConfiguration() to newConfiguration() aligns with the function being converted from exported to unexported, which follows the principle of minimizing the public API surface.


19-19: Improved error handling with Panic instead of Fatal

Changed from log.Fatalf to log.Panicf which allows deferred functions to run before termination. This ensures proper cleanup operations like db.CloseConnections() can execute.


23-23: Simplified server initialization by removing context parameter

The server initialization no longer requires the context parameter, which aligns with the updated NewServer function signature in server.go.


24-24: Consistent error handling approach

Changed from log.Fatal to log.Panic, maintaining consistency with the error handling approach used on line 19, ensuring deferred functions run before termination.

clean-code/app/config_test.go (4)

11-12: Improved test environment variable handling

Using t.Setenv() instead of os.Setenv() is a best practice in Go tests. The testing package automatically resets environment variables to their original values after the test completes, eliminating the need for manual cleanup with defer os.Unsetenv().


14-14: Updated function call to match unexported implementation

Changed from NewConfiguration() to newConfiguration() to match the visibility change of the function in the implementation.


21-21: Updated function call to match unexported implementation

Changed from NewConfiguration() to newConfiguration() to match the visibility change of the function in the implementation.


28-28: Improved test environment variable handling

Using t.Setenv() instead of os.Setenv() is a best practice in Go tests. The testing package automatically resets environment variables to their original values after the test completes.

clean-code/app/server/server.go (1)

11-12: Improved API design and documentation

The function signature has been simplified by removing the unnecessary context parameter, and the documentation comment has been improved with proper punctuation. This change demonstrates good API design by only requiring the essential parameters.

clean-code/app/server/services/books_test.go (4)

12-12: Added testify/require package for stronger assertions

Good addition of the require package which provides assertions that stop test execution immediately if they fail, useful for critical assertions where continuing would be meaningless.


16-16: Consistent mock naming convention

Changed from database.DatabaseMock to database.MockDatabase across all test functions, which follows the more common convention of using "Mock" as a prefix rather than a suffix for mock objects.

Also applies to: 26-26, 35-35, 44-44


21-21: Improved error assertion with require.NoError

Changed from assert.Nil(t, err) to require.NoError(t, err) which is more expressive and specifically checks for nil errors. This approach also stops test execution immediately if the assertion fails, which is appropriate when further test execution doesn't make sense without this check passing.

Also applies to: 40-40


31-31: More semantic error checking with assert.Error

Changed from assert.NotNil(t, err) to assert.Error(t, err) which is more expressive and specifically checks that the error is not nil. This makes the test intent clearer.

Also applies to: 49-49

clean-code/app/datasources/database/postgres_db.go (3)

20-20: Improved function signature to return concrete type

Changing the return type from an interface to the concrete *postgresDB type follows the Go idiom "accept interfaces, return structs". This is a good practice as it allows the factory pattern in NewDatabase to create the appropriate concrete implementation.


24-24: Proper error wrapping with %w

Using %w instead of a plain format string allows the original error to be preserved and later examined with errors.Is() or errors.As(). This is an important improvement for error handling.


35-35: Improved documentation consistency

Adding periods at the end of comment sentences improves documentation consistency throughout the codebase. This small change enhances readability and professionalism of the code.

Also applies to: 50-50, 59-59

clean-code/app/datasources/database/postgres_db_test.go (4)

9-9: Added require package for better test assertions

Adding the require package is a good improvement as it will halt test execution when assertions fail, preventing cascading test failures that can be hard to debug.


14-14: Improved error assertions with require.NoError

Replacing assert.Nil(t, err) with require.NoError(t, err) is a significant improvement that:

  1. Provides more descriptive error messages
  2. Stops the test on failure, preventing misleading follow-up errors
  3. Explicitly checks for errors, making the intent clearer

This change improves test robustness and makes failures easier to debug.

Also applies to: 24-24, 28-28, 33-33, 50-50, 60-60, 67-67, 79-79


25-25: Clearer length assertion

Using assert.Len(t, result, 1) instead of assert.Equal(t, len(result), 1) is more descriptive and provides better error messages specific to collection length checks.


43-43: Stricter error assertions with require.ErrorContains

Using require.ErrorContains instead of assert.ErrorContains ensures that the test will fail immediately if the error message doesn't contain the expected text, preventing execution of potentially confusing subsequent assertions.

Also applies to: 77-77

clean-code/app/datasources/database/memory_db_test.go (4)

8-8: Added require package for better test assertions

Adding the require package enables stricter assertions that halt test execution upon failure, which is especially important for error checking.


14-14: Improved error assertions with require.NoError

Replacing assert.Nil(t, err) with require.NoError(t, err) is a good practice that provides more descriptive error messages and stops the test on failure, preventing misleading follow-up errors.

Also applies to: 22-22, 25-25, 34-34, 38-38, 41-41


15-15: Better empty collection assertion

Using assert.Empty(t, books) is more semantically clear than checking the length explicitly and provides better error messages specific to empty collections.


26-26: Clearer length assertions

Using assert.Len(t, books, n) instead of checking collection length with equality assertions provides better readability and more specific error messages when tests fail.

Also applies to: 42-42

clean-code/app/datasources/database/db_test.go (5)

9-9: Added require package for better test assertions

Adding the require package enables stricter assertions that halt test execution upon failure, which is particularly important for error checking and consistent with the improvements in other test files.


15-15: Improved error assertions with require.NoError

Replacing assert.Nil(t, err) with require.NoError(t, err) provides more descriptive error messages and stops the test on failure, making tests more robust.

Also applies to: 23-23


16-17: Updated type assertions to match refactored implementation

The type assertions have been updated to check both the outer wrapper type (*database.DB) and the inner implementation type. This correctly reflects the structural changes in the NewDatabase function that now returns a DB wrapper with an implementation field.

Also applies to: 24-25


31-31: More precise error message assertion

Using assert.EqualError instead of assert.ErrorContains provides a more precise check by verifying the exact error message rather than just a substring. This is appropriate when the exact error message is known and stable.


35-35: Added helper function marker

Adding t.Helper() to the assertBook function improves error reporting by making the actual test failure line appear in the error output instead of reporting the line in the helper function. This makes test failures easier to locate and debug.

clean-code/app/datasources/database/db_mock.go (3)

9-9: Improved naming convention for mocks

Renaming the struct from DatabaseMock to MockDatabase follows the standard Go convention for mock objects (Mock + TypeName) and improves consistency across the codebase.


13-19: Enhanced type safety with proper error handling

The improved implementation safely handles type assertion failures by checking the return value of the type assertion with the ok variable. This prevents potential panics if the mock returns an unexpected type.


21-24: Consistent receiver name updates

The method receivers have been consistently updated to use the new struct name (MockDatabase instead of DatabaseMock), maintaining coherence throughout the implementation.

Also applies to: 26-27

clean-code/app/server/services/books.go (3)

18-20: Better naming with DefaultBooksService

Renaming from booksService to DefaultBooksService clearly indicates this is the standard implementation of the interface, making the code more self-documenting.


22-25: Return concrete type instead of interface

Changing the return type from the BooksService interface to a concrete *DefaultBooksService follows Go's best practice of "return concrete types, accept interfaces". This makes the code more explicit about what is being created while still allowing it to be used polymorphically where needed.


27-28: Consistent method documentation

Adding periods at the end of comments and updating receiver names to match the new struct type improves documentation consistency and readability throughout the codebase.

Also applies to: 44-45

clean-code/app/server/services/books_mock.go (3)

11-13: Standardized mock naming convention

The struct has been renamed from BooksServiceMock to MockBooksService, following the same convention applied to the database mock. This creates a consistent naming pattern for all mock objects across the codebase.


15-22: Improved type assertion safety

The GetBooks method now properly handles the case where type assertion fails by explicitly checking the ok value and returning an appropriate error response, preventing potential panics during testing.


24-27: Consistent receiver name update

The SaveBook method receiver has been updated to use the new struct name, maintaining consistency throughout the implementation.

clean-code/app/server/handlers/books_test.go (6)

16-16: Added require package for better test failures

Adding the require package from testify allows for immediate test failure when conditions aren't met, improving test clarity by failing fast rather than continuing execution after an error.


19-19: Changed variable to constant for immutable value

Converting booksRoute from a variable to a constant is appropriate since this value should never change during execution.


22-22: Updated mock service references

All references to the mock service have been updated to use the new type name MockBooksService, maintaining consistency with the changes in the mock implementation.

Also applies to: 38-39, 54-55, 67-68, 82-83


28-30: Improved HTTP method references and error handling

Replaced string literals for HTTP methods with constants from the http package, and changed error assertions from assert.Nil to require.NoError. These changes improve code readability and ensure tests fail immediately on errors rather than continuing execution.

Also applies to: 44-46, 61-62, 72-74, 89-90, 98-99


31-31: Added proper resource cleanup

Added defer resp.Body.Close() after each HTTP request to ensure resources are properly released, preventing potential resource leaks during testing.

Also applies to: 47-48, 63-64, 75-76, 91-92


103-109: Enhanced helper function

The bodyFromResponse helper function has been improved with:

  1. A nolint:ireturn directive to suppress linter warnings about returning interfaces
  2. t.Helper() call to properly attribute test failures to the calling test
  3. Updated error handling with require.NoError and a descriptive message

These changes improve both test output clarity and error reporting.

clean-code/app/datasources/database/db.go (6)

5-5: Good addition of a sentinel error for better error handling

Adding the errors package import and creating the ErrUnsupportedDatabase sentinel error improves error handling by allowing callers to check for specific error types using errors.Is().

Also applies to: 11-11


13-13: Improved documentation clarity

Good improvement on the comments for the Book and NewBook types. Clear documentation helps maintainers understand the purpose of each type.

Also applies to: 19-19


37-43: Good refactoring to use wrapper pattern

Changing the return type from the Database interface to a concrete *DB type implements the adapter pattern effectively. This provides consistency across different database implementations while preserving the abstraction benefits.

The in-memory database implementation is properly wrapped in the new DB struct.


45-52: Consistent implementation of the wrapper pattern for PostgreSQL

The PostgreSQL database implementation follows the same pattern as the in-memory implementation, maintaining consistency. Error handling is comprehensive with descriptive error messages.


54-55: Improved error handling with proper wrapping

Using fmt.Errorf with the %w verb to wrap the sentinel error allows preservation of the error chain. This is a Go best practice that enables callers to use errors.Is() for error type checking.


57-71: Clean implementation of the adapter pattern

The DB struct and its implementation of the Database interface methods follow the adapter pattern correctly. Each method simply delegates to the wrapped implementation, ensuring consistent behavior while allowing for different database backends.

This approach:

  1. Maintains interface compliance
  2. Centralizes any cross-cutting concerns that might be added later
  3. Provides flexibility to extend functionality without modifying the interface

Copy link
Member

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks mostly good but i left some hints
@norri

@norri norri requested a review from ReneWerner87 May 24, 2025 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants