-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
refactor: rename github_schema_file_paths table to schema_file_paths #1459
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: rename github_schema_file_paths table to schema_file_paths #1459
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: noritaka.ikeda@route06.co.jp <noritaka.ikeda@route06.co.jp>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
🤖 Devin AI EngineerI'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know: ✅ I will automatically:
Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository. ⚙️ Control Options:
|
Updates to Preview Branch (devin/1745409215-rename-github-schema-file-paths) ↗︎
Tasks are run on every commit but only new migration files are pushed.
View logs for this Workflow Run ↗︎. |
frontend/packages/prompt-test result:
|
CI Feedback 🧐(Feedback updated until commit 18b019f)A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:
|
…date related types
…ema override and related tests
This PR renames the 'github_schema_file_paths' table to 'schema_file_paths' and updates code references to improve naming consistency. A key concern is the inconsistent constraint and index naming which may lead to overlooked references and hints at potential performance impacts that need to be benchmarked. Overall, wrapping the migration in a transaction and aligning table names with project conventions is a positive step that, once refined, will further improve system integrity. ER Diagram:
|
This PR renames the github_schema_file_paths table to schema_file_paths and updates all related code references while wrapping the migration in a transaction for atomicity. A key issue is the inconsistent constraint naming that still uses the old prefix and the need to verify post-migration data integrity and performance. Overall, the migration improves naming clarity and safety, though updating constraint names and confirming performance and permission alignment are important next steps. ER Diagram:
|
… and renaming table to schema_file_paths
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, but please check a comment!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I recommend to wrap all migration statements between BEGIN; and COMMIT.
Co-Authored-By: noritaka.ikeda@route06.co.jp <noritaka.ikeda@route06.co.jp>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
What does this PR do?
Renames the
github_schema_file_paths
table toschema_file_paths
to follow the naming convention wheregithub_
prefix is only used for tables that manage GitHub resource IDs.The job has been tested and confirmed working.
Changes
Why?
The
github_
prefix should be used only for tables that manage GitHub resource IDs. Thegithub_schema_file_paths
table manages schema file paths which are Git resources, not GitHub resources.Link to Devin run
https://app.devin.ai/sessions/9a42dbe7c6d64fb493ca2b96d47a6643
Requested by
noritaka.ikeda@route06.co.jp