Skip to content

fix: improve performance of checking id index #1717

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2025
Merged

Conversation

maxnowack
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@maxnowack maxnowack enabled auto-merge (rebase) May 8, 2025 12:47
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (2e68769) to head (8558aa2).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1717   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           56        56           
  Lines         1819      1822    +3     
  Branches       419       421    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits          1819      1822    +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 8, 2025

Bundle Report

Changes will increase total bundle size by 310 bytes (0.0%) ⬆️. This is within the configured threshold ✅

Detailed changes
Bundle name Size Change
@signaldb/core 223.21kB 310 bytes (0.14%) ⬆️

Affected Assets, Files, and Routes:

view changes for bundle: @signaldb/core

Assets Changed:

Asset Name Size Change Total Size Change (%)
index.cjs2.js 155 bytes 31.32kB 0.5%
index2.mjs 155 bytes 31.11kB 0.5%

@maxnowack maxnowack merged commit 87b7a69 into main May 8, 2025
18 checks passed
@maxnowack maxnowack deleted the id-index-perf branch May 8, 2025 12:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant