Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why did you added "license": "(MIT OR GPL-3.0)" #121

Closed
opensrc0 opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

why did you added "license": "(MIT OR GPL-3.0)" #121

opensrc0 opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@opensrc0
Copy link

Hey,

Why did you added "license": "(MIT OR GPL-3.0)", you can simply add "license": "MIT". Is there something you are achieving by providing MIT or GPL-3.0 License ?

@nbubna
Copy link
Owner

nbubna commented Dec 14, 2023

I was following a precedent i'd seen done by other OSS, particularly in JS front-end. I wanted to ensure that this software was available for any and all use, whether in a GPL product or in a commercial business use.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants