[dns-server] Answers for the rack's zones should be authoritative #8120
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes most answers authoritative and changes tests to match. This won't change rack-internal DNS behavior; we don't rely on
aa
in answers for anything internal. External DNS servers will also now set theaa
bit for queries for silo domains, though, so our DNS answers will look a bit more normal.We're authoritative for
NXDomain
answers to names under the zones a server is authoritative for that are not present, though we're not (yet) sending an SOA record to indicate how long a client can cache the negative reuslt.We are not authoritative for
ServFail
answers even if they are for names we're authoritative for. Theaa
bit here has no RFC-defined meaning, and this is more straightforward than trying to partitionServFail
into "our names" and "not our names" kinds.