New: Add pipe syntax support for function calls like in Jinja2, resolves #294 #296
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
navrocky
changed the title
navrocky
force-pushed
the
feature/pipe-syntax
branch
4 times, most recently
from
8b02019 to
18c7a49
Compare
|
All test passed after cherry pick this commit on latest master 2d1f0d0, could you rebase this branch? Thanks! |
navrocky
force-pushed
the
feature/pipe-syntax
branch
from
18c7a49 to
1943d6e
Compare
Done |
navrocky
force-pushed
the
feature/pipe-syntax
branch
from
1943d6e to
e0cecc2
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Functions can now be chained together using the pipe syntax:
This syntax:
equals to: