Skip to content

Add auto_insurance_claim project #78

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

CLARION-isige
Copy link

@CLARION-isige CLARION-isige commented Mar 14, 2025

An auto insurance claims project for Daily Dose of Data Science assessment for technical writers.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Launched an auto insurance claim processing application with a user-friendly web interface. Users can now upload JSON-formatted claim files to trigger asynchronous processing that presents structured claim decisions and recommendations.
    • Integrated external services for policy retrieval and analysis to streamline claim evaluations.
  • Documentation

    • Released comprehensive user guidance including setup instructions, usage details, and workflow diagrams to help users fully leverage the application.
    • Added a .gitignore file to maintain a clean repository by ignoring unnecessary files.
    • Introduced a requirements.txt file listing necessary dependencies for project functionality.
    • Added a detailed README.md to describe application functionality and architecture.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several new files to the auto insurance claim project. A new .gitignore maintains repository cleanliness. Comprehensive documentation is provided in the README.md along with a dependency manifest in requirements.txt. The implementation now includes API configurations, data retrieval functions, prompt constants, and Pydantic models for claim data. An asynchronous Streamlit application (app.py) has been added to handle JSON claim uploads, while a new workflow engine (workflows.py) orchestrates claim processing through event-driven steps and integrations with external services.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
auto_insurance_claim/.gitignore New file specifying ignore patterns for Python byte-code, build artifacts, logs, unit test reports, and other non-trackable files.
auto_insurance_claim/README.md, auto_insurance_claim/requirements.txt New documentation and dependency manifest outlining project purpose, setup instructions, usage guidelines, and exact package versions required for the project.
auto_insurance_claim/api.py, auto_insurance_claim/declarations.py Added functions for API integrations, environment variable management, and retrieval of policy declarations using Llama Cloud configurations.
auto_insurance_claim/app.py Introduced a Streamlit-based asynchronous UI that accepts JSON claim file uploads and initiates the claim processing workflow.
auto_insurance_claim/prompts.py, auto_insurance_claim/schema.py New prompt constants for generating policy queries and recommendations alongside Pydantic models defining the structure for claim info, policy queries, recommendations, and decisions.
auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py Created an asynchronous workflow engine using event-driven steps for auto insurance claim processing; includes event classes and methods from claim extraction to final decision output.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant UI as Streamlit UI
    participant Workflow as AutoInsuranceWorkflow
    participant API as External Services

    User->>UI: Upload JSON claim file
    UI->>Workflow: Trigger asynchronous main function
    Workflow->>Workflow: load_claim_info()
    Workflow->>Workflow: generate_policy_queries()
    Workflow->>API: retrieve_policy_text()
    API-->>Workflow: Return policy details
    Workflow->>Workflow: generate_recommendation()
    Workflow->>Workflow: finalize_decision()
    Workflow->>UI: Send result for output
    UI-->>User: Display claim decision
Loading

Poem

Oh, I’m a rabbit with a digital hop,
Skipping through code, never gonna stop.
Docs and workflows bloom like spring,
New prompts and APIs make my heart sing.
With each async step, I gleefully bound,
Celebrating changes where clarity's found!
🐇💻🌸

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 8

🧹 Nitpick comments (22)
auto_insurance_claim/.gitignore (3)

39-53: Review: Unit Tests and Coverage Reports

The ignore patterns for test and coverage reports (e.g., .tox/, .nox/, .coverage*, .pytest_cache/) cover the expected files and directories.
Nitpick: The pattern on line 49 (*.py,cover) is uncommon. Please verify if this is intentional or a typo; typically, one might expect a pattern like *.pyc or similar.


56-58: Review: Environment Files

The .env file is correctly ignored. Consider verifying if additional virtual environment directories (e.g., venv/, env/) should be included for consistency.


59-62: Review: Final Section and Duplicate Entries

  • The file ignores tests.ipynb and specifies directories like auto_ins_env/ and ai-engineering-hub/, which seem to be project-specific; please confirm that these entries are intended.
  • Duplicate Entry Warning: The __pycache__/ directory appears again on line 60. Since it is already covered at the top (line 2), you may remove this duplicate to avoid redundancy.
auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py (3)

18-36: Consider adding docstrings to event classes.

Adding short docstrings or comments for each event class will help clarify their usage and purpose in the workflow, especially for new contributors or future maintainers.


38-43: Add file-reading error handling and clarify usage of model_validate.

  1. Consider wrapping file I/O with try-except blocks to gracefully handle file not found or JSON decode errors.
  2. Confirm that ClaimInfo.model_validate(data) is correct for your Pydantic version. If you’re on Pydantic v2, this is valid, otherwise use ClaimInfo.parse_obj(data) or the equivalent method.
 def parse_claim(data: str) -> ClaimInfo:
     import json
     try:
         with open(data, "r") as f:
             content = json.load(f)
-        return ClaimInfo.model_validate(content)
+        return ClaimInfo.model_validate(content)  # or ClaimInfo.parse_obj(content) for Pydantic v1
     except (FileNotFoundError, json.JSONDecodeError) as e:
         raise ValueError(f"Failed to read or parse the claim file: {e}")

62-73: Validate LLM responses and logs for debugging.

Although the logic to generate policy queries is correct, adding a brief logging event for the raw LLM response can aid troubleshooting.

auto_insurance_claim/declarations.py (2)

1-4: Remove unused import MetadataInfo.

The MetadataInfo class is imported but never used in the code. This adds unnecessary dependencies and can make the code harder to understand.

-from llama_index.core.vector_stores.types import (
-    MetadataInfo,
-    MetadataFilters,
-)
+from llama_index.core.vector_stores.types import MetadataFilters
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

2-2: llama_index.core.vector_stores.types.MetadataInfo imported but unused

Remove unused import: llama_index.core.vector_stores.types.MetadataInfo

(F401)


34-35: Consider adding a docstring parameter for filters.

The filters parameter is passed to the retriever but isn't documented in the function's docstring, which only mentions policy_number and top_k.

 def get_declarations_docs(policy_number: str, top_k: int = 1):
-    """Get declarations retriever."""
+    """Get declarations retriever.
+    
+    Args:
+        policy_number: The policy number to filter documents by.
+        top_k: Maximum number of results to return (default: 1).
+        
+    Returns:
+        Retrieved documents related to the specified policy number.
+    """
auto_insurance_claim/prompts.py (2)

15-16: Add schema reference for PolicyQueries.

The prompt mentions returning a JSON object matching the PolicyQueries schema, but there's no reference to what this schema looks like. This could lead to inconsistent outputs.

Consider adding a comment or reference to the schema definition to help users understand the expected structure:

-Return a JSON object matching the PolicyQueries schema.
+Return a JSON object matching the PolicyQueries schema:
+"""
+{
+    "queries": [
+        "What is the collision coverage limit for policy <policy_number>?",
+        "What is the deductible for collision coverage?",
+        ...
+    ]
+}
+"""

32-33: Add schema reference for PolicyRecommendation.

Similarly, the second prompt mentions a PolicyRecommendation schema without specifying its structure.

Add details about the expected schema:

-Return a JSON object matching PolicyRecommendation schema.
+Return a JSON object matching PolicyRecommendation schema:
+"""
+{
+    "covered": true|false,
+    "deductible": <amount>,
+    "recommended_settlement": <amount>,
+    "applicable_policy_section": "<section reference>",
+    "reasoning": "<explanation>"
+}
+"""
auto_insurance_claim/README.md (2)

32-44: Specify language for fenced code block.

The code block representing the workflow diagram should specify a language (or use "text" if it's plain text ASCII art).

-```
+```text
 ┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐
 │ Upload Claim│────▶│Generate     │────▶│Retrieve     │────▶│Generate     │
 │ JSON File   │     │Policy       │     │Policy       │     │Recommend-   │
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

32-32: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


68-74: Specify language for fenced code block for environment variables.

The environment variables code block should specify a language (use "env" or "bash").

-```
+```env
 LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY=your_llama_cloud_api_key
 ORGANIZATION_ID=your_llama_cloud_org_id
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

68-68: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

auto_insurance_claim/app.py (4)

39-42: Remove commented code.

There are several blocks of commented-out code that appear to be left over from development. Clean these up to improve code readability.

-# col1, col2 = st.columns(2)
-
-# with col1:
-#     declaration_file = st.file_uploader("Upload Policy Declaration File (.md)", type=['md'])

48-50: Fix indentation and clarify commented code.

There's inconsistent indentation and more commented-out code relating to policy content.

-    if  claim_file:
-        # policy_content = declaration_file.read().decode()
+    if claim_file:
         claim_data = json.loads(claim_file.read().decode())

54-58: Remove more commented code.

Another block of commented code related to policy information display should be removed.

-        # # Display policy information
-        # st.subheader("Policy Information")
-        # with st.expander("View Policy Details"):
-        #     st.markdown(policy_content)
-

69-76: Improve error handling and user feedback.

The error handling is minimal and does not provide detailed information to the user about what went wrong. Consider adding more informative error messages and logging.

     try:
         # Process the claim using the temporary file path
         with st.spinner("Analyzing claim against policy..."):
             try: 
                 response = await stream_workflow(workflow, claim_json_path=temp_path)
                 st.write(response["decision"])
             except Exception as e:
-                st.error(f"An error occurred: {e}")
+                st.error(f"Error processing claim: {str(e)}")
+                st.error("Please check your claim data format and try again.")
+                import traceback
+                st.exception(traceback.format_exc())
auto_insurance_claim/api.py (6)

14-22: Add docstring and consider extracting hardcoded values.

The function lacks documentation and contains hardcoded values that should ideally be configurable.

def policy_index(): 
+    """Creates and returns a LlamaCloudIndex for auto insurance policy.
+    
+    Returns:
+        LlamaCloudIndex: An index for auto insurance policy documents.
+    
+    Raises:
+        ValueError: If required environment variables are not set.
+    """
    index = LlamaCloudIndex(
        name="auto_insurance_policy", 
        project_name="ddods",
        organization_id=org_id,
        api_key=llama_cloud_api_key
    )
    return index 

23-29: Add docstring and improve error handling.

Similar to the previous function, this one lacks documentation and doesn't handle potential errors if the API key is not set.

def llama_client(): 
+    """Creates and returns a LlamaCloud client.
+    
+    Returns:
+        LlamaCloud: A configured LlamaCloud client.
+    
+    Raises:
+        ValueError: If required environment variables are not set.
+    """
    client = LlamaCloud(
        base_url="https://api.cloud.llamaindex.ai",
        token = llama_cloud_api_key
    )
    return client 

30-34: Add docstring and improve formatting.

The function needs documentation, and there's a minor formatting issue with the parenthesis placement.

def ollama_llm():
+    """Creates and returns an Ollama LLM instance.
+    
+    Returns:
+        Ollama: A configured Ollama LLM instance.
+    """
-    llm = Ollama(model="llama3.1:latest", request_timeout=360.0
-    )
+    llm = Ollama(
+        model="llama3.1:latest", 
+        request_timeout=360.0
+    )
    return llm 

46-48: Fix string continuation in error message.

The backslash continuation with a space after it might cause issues with the error message formatting.

    if not api_key:
        raise ValueError(
-            "OPIK API KEY not set visit https://www.comet.com/opik\
-            to set" 
+            "OPIK API KEY not set visit https://www.comet.com/opik to set" 
        )

49-50: Missing final newline at end of file.

Add a newline at the end of the file to comply with standard coding conventions.

    return api_key, opik_workspace, project_name
+

1-50: Consider adding type hints to improve code readability and IDE support.

Adding type hints to function parameters and return values would make the code more maintainable and self-documenting.

-def policy_index(): 
+def policy_index() -> LlamaCloudIndex: 

-def llama_client(): 
+def llama_client() -> LlamaCloud: 

-def ollama_llm():
+def ollama_llm() -> Ollama:

-def get_opik_tracker(): 
+def get_opik_tracker() -> tuple[str, str, str]: 
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e59a170 and ab7dd75.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • auto_insurance_claim/.gitignore (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/README.md (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/api.py (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/app.py (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/declarations.py (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/prompts.py (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/requirements.txt (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/schema.py (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
auto_insurance_claim/README.md

[uncategorized] ~116-~116: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... } ``` ## Project Structure - app.py: Streamlit web application - `api.py`: C...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~138-~138: The preposition ‘to’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...sing steps: 1. Define new schema models in schema.py 2. Create additional prompt...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_IN_TO)


[uncategorized] ~139-~139: The preposition ‘to’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...2. Create additional prompt templates inprompts.py` 3. Extend the workflow in ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_IN_TO)


[style] ~182-~182: The phrase ‘feel free to’ is used quite frequently. Consider using a less frequent alternative to set your writing apart from others and make it sound more professional.
Context: ...ontributing Contributions are welcome! Please feel free to submit a Pull Request. 1. Fork the rep...

(FEEL_FREE_TO_STYLE_ME)


[style] ~186-~186: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ...azing-feature) 3. Commit your changes (git commit -m 'Add some amazing feature') 4. Push to the branch (git ...

(AWESOME)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
auto_insurance_claim/README.md

32-32: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


68-68: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
auto_insurance_claim/declarations.py

2-2: llama_index.core.vector_stores.types.MetadataInfo imported but unused

Remove unused import: llama_index.core.vector_stores.types.MetadataInfo

(F401)

🔇 Additional comments (15)
auto_insurance_claim/.gitignore (6)

1-5: Review: Byte-compiled / Optimized Files

The patterns for ignoring Python bytecode and optimized files (e.g., __pycache__/, *.py[cod], *$py.class) are correctly specified.


6-8: Review: C Extensions Section

The entry to ignore C extension files (*.so) is concise and standard.


9-28: Review: Distribution / Packaging Entries

The file includes a comprehensive list of directories and file patterns to ignore build artifacts, eggs, and distribution-related files. This will help keep the repository clean from unnecessary files.


29-34: Review: PyInstaller Files

The rules for ignoring PyInstaller-related files (e.g., *.manifest, *.spec) are clearly commented and appropriate.


35-37: Review: Installer Logs

The installer log files (pip-log.txt, pip-delete-this-directory.txt) are correctly added to the ignore list.


54-55: Review: Jupyter Notebook Checkpoints

The inclusion of .ipynb_checkpoints is standard practice for Jupyter Notebook environments.

auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py (5)

1-8: All imports look correct.

No issues identified with your import statements for the workflow and decorator framework.


44-53: Constructor logic is straightforward.

Your workflow constructor successfully sets up the retriever and LLM dependency.


105-120: Recommendation generation logic looks good.

No major issues with generating coverage recommendations.


139-144: Result output is appropriately handled.

The final decision output is clearly communicated to the user.


74-104:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Potential doc content conflicts when IDs collide.

Because you're storing documents by doc.id_ in combined_docs, multiple docs sharing the same ID could overwrite each other. Verify whether this behavior is desired or if you need to aggregate content.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Identify all references to `id_` to check for collisions or multi-document merges
rg "\.id_"

Length of output: 166


Action Required: Verify document aggregation behavior

The code uses combined_docs[d.id_] = d to store documents, which means that if more than one document shares the same id_, subsequent documents will overwrite earlier ones. Please verify whether this "last write wins" behavior is intentional. If multiple documents with the same ID should be aggregated rather than overwritten (for example, by collecting them into a list), consider updating the logic accordingly.

  • Location: auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py, lines 74-104
  • Relevant snippets:
    • In the loop over ev.queries.queries: combined_docs[d.id_] = d
    • When adding the declarations doc: combined_docs[d_doc.id_] = d_doc
auto_insurance_claim/schema.py (2)

1-3: Evaluate necessity of nest_asyncio usage.

nest_asyncio can introduce complexity and unexpected behavior. Confirm if it’s strictly needed—or if higher-level frameworks (like Streamlit) already handle event loops seamlessly.


18-49: Schema definitions appear consistent and logical.

All classes are well-structured, properly typed, and enable clear extension for future fields.

auto_insurance_claim/declarations.py (1)

31-32: Address the TODO comment.

There's a TODO comment indicating that file-level retrieval needs to be implemented. This should be addressed or the comment should provide more context on why it's being preserved.

Could you clarify the requirements for file-level retrieval and whether this is a known limitation or something that should be implemented before merging?

auto_insurance_claim/README.md (1)

58-60: Update repository URL.

The clone URL appears to be a placeholder and should be updated to reflect the actual repository.

-git clone https://github.com/your-username/auto-insurance-claim-processing.git
+git clone https://github.com/patchy631/ai-engineering-hub.git

Please verify the correct repository URL for this project.

Comment on lines 121 to 138
@step
async def finalize_decision(self, ctx: Context, ev: RecommendationEvent) -> DecisionEvent:
if self._verbose:
st.info("Finalizing Decision")
claim_info = await ctx.get("claim_info")
rec = ev.recommendation
covered = "covered" in rec.recommendation_summary.lower() or (rec.settlement_amount is not None and rec.settlement_amount > 0)
deductible = rec.deductible if rec.deductible is not None else 0.0
recommended_payout = rec.settlement_amount if rec.settlement_amount else 0.0
decision = ClaimDecision(
claim_number=claim_info.claim_number,
covered=covered,
deductible=deductible,
recommended_payout=recommended_payout,
notes=rec.recommendation_summary
)
return DecisionEvent(decision=decision)

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve substring-based coverage detection.

Simply checking if "covered" is in recommendation_summary.lower() might produce false positives. For example, a summary containing "not covered" still has "covered" as a substring.

- covered = "covered" in rec.recommendation_summary.lower() or (
-     rec.settlement_amount is not None and rec.settlement_amount > 0
- )
+ summary_lower = rec.recommendation_summary.lower()
+ covered = (
+     ("covered" in summary_lower and "not covered" not in summary_lower)
+     or (rec.settlement_amount is not None and rec.settlement_amount > 0)
+ )
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
@step
async def finalize_decision(self, ctx: Context, ev: RecommendationEvent) -> DecisionEvent:
if self._verbose:
st.info("Finalizing Decision")
claim_info = await ctx.get("claim_info")
rec = ev.recommendation
covered = "covered" in rec.recommendation_summary.lower() or (rec.settlement_amount is not None and rec.settlement_amount > 0)
deductible = rec.deductible if rec.deductible is not None else 0.0
recommended_payout = rec.settlement_amount if rec.settlement_amount else 0.0
decision = ClaimDecision(
claim_number=claim_info.claim_number,
covered=covered,
deductible=deductible,
recommended_payout=recommended_payout,
notes=rec.recommendation_summary
)
return DecisionEvent(decision=decision)
@step
async def finalize_decision(self, ctx: Context, ev: RecommendationEvent) -> DecisionEvent:
if self._verbose:
st.info("Finalizing Decision")
claim_info = await ctx.get("claim_info")
rec = ev.recommendation
summary_lower = rec.recommendation_summary.lower()
covered = (
("covered" in summary_lower and "not covered" not in summary_lower)
or (rec.settlement_amount is not None and rec.settlement_amount > 0)
)
deductible = rec.deductible if rec.deductible is not None else 0.0
recommended_payout = rec.settlement_amount if rec.settlement_amount else 0.0
decision = ClaimDecision(
claim_number=claim_info.claim_number,
covered=covered,
deductible=deductible,
recommended_payout=recommended_payout,
notes=rec.recommendation_summary
)
return DecisionEvent(decision=decision)

Comment on lines +55 to +60
async def load_claim_info(self, ctx: Context, ev: StartEvent) -> ClaimInfoEvent:
if self._verbose:
ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(msg=">> Loading Claim Info"))
claim_info = parse_claim(ev.claim_json_path)
await ctx.set("claim_info", claim_info)
return ClaimInfoEvent(claim_info=claim_info)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Handle invalid claim JSON path.

If ev.claim_json_path is missing or invalid, the workflow might crash. Consider adding early checks or verifying file existence before calling parse_claim(...).


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for references to `claim_json_path` usage in the codebase to confirm we handle errors properly.
rg --color never -A 3 "claim_json_path"

Length of output: 681


Action Required: Validate and Handle Invalid Claim JSON Path

In auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py (lines 55–60), the load_claim_info method directly passes ev.claim_json_path to parse_claim without any validation. Although error handling is present in auto_insurance_claim/app.py, relying solely on a higher-level catch block may not sufficiently prevent crashes or unexpected behavior in the workflow. I recommend adding an early check in load_claim_info to verify that ev.claim_json_path is both provided and points to an existing, accessible file. For example:

  • Use Python’s os.path.exists(ev.claim_json_path) or similar to confirm file existence.
  • Raise a clear exception or handle the error gracefully before proceeding with the claim parsing.

This proactive validation will improve the robustness of the workflow and clarify the assumption about the file being present.

Comment on lines 1 to 9
streamlit==1.43.2
llama-index==0.12.22
llama-index-indices-managed-llama-cloud==0.6.8
llama-cloud==0.1.14
llama-parse==0.6.4.post1
llama-index-embeddings-huggingface==0.5.2
llama-index-utils-workflow==0.3.0
llama-index-llms-ollama==0.5.3
opik==1.6.2
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify package versions and check for known vulnerabilities.

Pinned versions ensure reproducible builds. However, confirm they are secure and current.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Checking for known security issues and latest versions of each pinned dependency
packages=( streamlit llama-index llama-index-indices-managed-llama-cloud llama-cloud llama-parse llama-index-embeddings-huggingface llama-index-utils-workflow llama-index-llms-ollama opik )
for pkg in "${packages[@]}"; do
  echo "## Checking $pkg on PyPI"
  curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/${pkg}/json" | jq '.info.name, .info.version'
done

echo "## Checking for GitHub security advisories..."
gh api graphql -F query='
query {
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 100, ecosystem: PIP) {
    nodes {
      package {
        name
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      advisory {
        summary
        publishedAt
        severity
      }
    }
  }
}
'

Length of output: 24697


Action: Update Version Pins for Minor Patches

  • llama-index: The file pins version 0.12.22, but PyPI shows 0.12.23.
  • opik: The file pins version 1.6.2, while PyPI now lists 1.6.3.
  • All other packages match the latest versions.
  • No known security vulnerabilities were reported for any of these dependencies.

Please update the pinned versions for llama-index and opik to incorporate the latest patches.

Comment on lines 8 to 16
class ClaimInfo(BaseModel):
"""Extracted Insurance claim information."""
claim_number: str
policy_number: str
claimant_name: str
date_of_loss: str
loss_description: str
estimated_repair_cost: float
vehicle_details: Optional[str] = None
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using a proper date type for date_of_loss.

Using a str may lead to invalid data slipping through. A datetime or date field provides built-in validation.

-from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
+from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
+from datetime import date

 class ClaimInfo(BaseModel):
     ...
-    date_of_loss: str
+    date_of_loss: date
     ...
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
class ClaimInfo(BaseModel):
"""Extracted Insurance claim information."""
claim_number: str
policy_number: str
claimant_name: str
date_of_loss: str
loss_description: str
estimated_repair_cost: float
vehicle_details: Optional[str] = None
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
from datetime import date
from typing import Optional
class ClaimInfo(BaseModel):
"""Extracted Insurance claim information."""
claim_number: str
policy_number: str
claimant_name: str
date_of_loss: date
loss_description: str
estimated_repair_cost: float
vehicle_details: Optional[str] = None

Comment on lines +13 to +14
llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling for missing environment variables.

The code assumes that the environment variables LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY and ORGANIZATION_ID exist. If they're missing, subsequent code will fail with unclear errors.

-llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
-org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
+llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
+if not llama_cloud_api_key:
+    raise ValueError("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY environment variable is required")
+
+org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
+if not org_id:
+    raise ValueError("ORGANIZATION_ID environment variable is required")
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
if not llama_cloud_api_key:
raise ValueError("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY environment variable is required")
org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
if not org_id:
raise ValueError("ORGANIZATION_ID environment variable is required")

Comment on lines 77 to 78
1. Ensure you have Ollama LLM running locally. Check out the installation here;
<a> https://github.com/ollama/ollama</a>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix the hyperlink in the Ollama installation reference.

The hyperlink is incorrectly formatted. In Markdown, the link text should be in square brackets followed by the URL in parentheses.

-1. Ensure you have Ollama LLM running locally. Check out the installation here;
-<a> https://github.com/ollama/ollama</a>
+1. Ensure you have Ollama LLM running locally. Check out the installation [here](https://github.com/ollama/ollama).
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
1. Ensure you have Ollama LLM running locally. Check out the installation here;
<a> https://github.com/ollama/ollama</a>
1. Ensure you have Ollama LLM running locally. Check out the installation [here](https://github.com/ollama/ollama).

Comment on lines +81 to +83
else:
st.info("Please upload a policy declaration file to begin.")

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Update error message for clarity.

The error message suggests uploading a policy declaration file, but the UI only shows a claim file uploader. This is likely an oversight from removing the policy declaration upload functionality.

-        st.info("Please upload a policy declaration file to begin.")
+        st.info("Please upload a claim file to begin.")
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
else:
st.info("Please upload a policy declaration file to begin.")
else:
st.info("Please upload a claim file to begin.")

Comment on lines +10 to +12
# Llama cloud
llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling for missing environment variables.

The code retrieves the API key and organization ID but doesn't check if they are missing. Without proper error handling, this could lead to unexpected failures when these variables are used later in the code.

# Llama cloud 
llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
+if not llama_cloud_api_key or not org_id:
+    raise ValueError("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY and ORGANIZATION_ID environment variables must be set")
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# Llama cloud
llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
# Llama cloud
llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
if not llama_cloud_api_key or not org_id:
raise ValueError("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY and ORGANIZATION_ID environment variables must be set")

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py (2)

38-42: Rename parameter and handle JSON-parse errors more robustly.

Currently, the function parameter data is used to represent a file path. Consider renaming it (e.g., file_path) to improve clarity. Additionally, json.load may raise JSONDecodeError if the file contains invalid JSON. Adding explicit exception handling or validation would safeguard against unexpected crashes.

-def parse_claim(data: str) -> ClaimInfo:
+def parse_claim(file_path: str) -> ClaimInfo:
     import json
-    with open(data, "r") as f:
+    with open(file_path, "r") as f:
         try:
             data = json.load(f)
         except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
             raise ValueError(f"Invalid JSON in {file_path}: {e}")
     return ClaimInfo.model_validate(data)

127-131: Consider more robust coverage logic.

The check for "covered" in the summary (while excluding "not covered") can still miss synonyms or conditions like "uncovered" or "discovered," potentially leading to false positives. You may want to refine the coverage logic to handle alternative keywords or rely on more structured coverage indicators.

auto_insurance_claim/schema.py (1)

8-16: Consider additional validation constraints for date fields.

Using a date type for date_of_loss helps ensure correct formats. However, you might also prevent invalid or future dates (if business rules require the loss date to be historical). Pydantic allows you to add custom validators or constraints to ensure data accuracy.

auto_insurance_claim/README.md (2)

32-44: Add language specification to fenced code block.

The ASCII workflow diagram code block should have a language specifier to comply with Markdown best practices. Since this is an ASCII diagram, you can use ascii or text as the language.

-```
+```ascii
 ┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐
 │ Upload Claim│────▶│Generate     │────▶│Retrieve     │────▶│Generate     │
 │ JSON File   │     │Policy       │     │Policy       │     │Recommend-   │
 └─────────────┘     │Queries      │     │Text         │     │ation        │
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

32-32: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


68-74: Add language specification to code block.

The environment variables code block is missing a language specifier. Since this is a plain text configuration file, you can use text or env as the language.

-```
+```env
 LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY=your_llama_cloud_api_key
 ORGANIZATION_ID=your_llama_cloud_org_id
 OPIK_API_KEY=your_opik_api_key
 OPIK_WORKSPACE=your_opik_workspace
 OPIK_PROJECT_NAME=your_opik_project_name
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

68-68: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

auto_insurance_claim/api.py (2)

41-42: Fix formatting of closing parenthesis.

The closing parenthesis should be on the same line as the last parameter for consistent formatting.

-    llm = Ollama(model="llama3.1:latest", request_timeout=360.0
-    )
+    llm = Ollama(model="llama3.1:latest", request_timeout=360.0)

56-58: Fix line continuation in error message.

The line continuation in the error message uses a backslash which can cause formatting issues. It's better to use concatenation or triple quotes for multi-line strings.

-            "OPIK API KEY not set visit https://www.comet.com/opik\
-            to set" 
+            "OPIK API KEY not set visit https://www.comet.com/opik to set"

Alternatively, you could use triple quotes for better readability:

            """OPIK API KEY not set visit https://www.comet.com/opik 
            to set"""
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab7dd75 and bbf5f08.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • auto_insurance_claim/README.md (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/api.py (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/app.py (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/requirements.txt (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/schema.py (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • auto_insurance_claim/app.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
auto_insurance_claim/README.md

[uncategorized] ~117-~117: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... } ``` ## Project Structure - app.py: Streamlit web application - `api.py`: C...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[style] ~183-~183: The phrase ‘feel free to’ is used quite frequently. Consider using a less frequent alternative to set your writing apart from others and make it sound more professional.
Context: ...ontributing Contributions are welcome! Please feel free to submit a Pull Request. 1. Fork the rep...

(FEEL_FREE_TO_STYLE_ME)


[style] ~187-~187: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ...azing-feature) 3. Commit your changes (git commit -m 'Add some amazing feature') 4. Push to the branch (git ...

(AWESOME)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
auto_insurance_claim/README.md

32-32: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


68-68: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py (1)

55-60: Validate and handle missing or invalid JSON path.

This remains the same concern raised previously: the workflow directly passes ev.claim_json_path to parse_claim without verifying file existence or catch blocks for file I/O errors. Add early checks or handle exceptions to prevent runtime failures.

auto_insurance_claim/requirements.txt (1)

1-9:

✅ Verification successful

Confirm dependency security and version currency.

Pinned dependencies ensure reproducible builds, but it's good practice to confirm no new vulnerabilities or critical patches have been released.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify pinned versions are current and secure on PyPI, and check for known vulnerabilities on GitHub.

packages=(
  "streamlit==1.43.2"
  "llama-index==0.12.23"
  "llama-index-indices-managed-llama-cloud==0.6.8"
  "llama-cloud==0.1.14"
  "llama-parse==0.6.4.post1"
  "llama-index-embeddings-huggingface==0.5.2"
  "llama-index-utils-workflow==0.3.0"
  "llama-index-llms-ollama==0.5.3"
  "opik==1.6.3"
)

for pkg in "${packages[@]}"; do
  echo "## Checking $pkg on PyPI"
  base_pkg=${pkg%%==*}
  curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/${base_pkg}/json" | jq '.info.name, .info.version'
done

echo "## Checking for GitHub security advisories..."
gh api graphql -F query='
query {
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 100, ecosystem: PIP) {
    nodes {
      package {
        name
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      advisory {
        summary
        publishedAt
        severity
      }
    }
  }
}
'

Length of output: 25210


Dependency versions and security verified – no updates needed.

The script confirmed that each dependency in auto_insurance_claim/requirements.txt is pinned to the current release on PyPI, and none of these packages were flagged in the GitHub security advisories. Please continue monitoring for any future advisories, but for now everything is in good standing.

Comment on lines 10 to 15
# Llama cloud
llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
# Llama cloud
llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove duplicated code for environment variable retrieval.

There are duplicate lines retrieving the same environment variables. This redundancy should be eliminated.

 # Llama cloud 
 llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
 org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
-# Llama cloud 
-llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
-org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# Llama cloud
llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
# Llama cloud
llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
# Llama cloud
llama_cloud_api_key = os.getenv("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY")
org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")

Comment on lines 17 to 22
if not llama_cloud_api_key:
raise ValueError("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY environment variable is required")

org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
if not org_id:
raise ValueError("ORGANIZATION_ID environment variable is required")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consolidate environment variable validation.

The org_id is retrieved again after it was already retrieved earlier. Consolidate the validation of both environment variables into a single block.

 if not llama_cloud_api_key:
     raise ValueError("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY environment variable is required")

-org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
 if not org_id:
     raise ValueError("ORGANIZATION_ID environment variable is required")
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if not llama_cloud_api_key:
raise ValueError("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY environment variable is required")
org_id = os.getenv("ORGANIZATION_ID")
if not org_id:
raise ValueError("ORGANIZATION_ID environment variable is required")
if not llama_cloud_api_key:
raise ValueError("LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY environment variable is required")
if not org_id:
raise ValueError("ORGANIZATION_ID environment variable is required")

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py (4)

11-16: Use absolute imports for better maintainability.

The current imports use relative paths which could lead to issues when the codebase grows. Consider using absolute imports for better clarity and maintainability.

- from prompts import POLICY_RECOMMENDATION_PROMPT,\
-     GENERATE_POLICY_QUERIES_PROMPT
- from schema import ClaimInfo, PolicyQueries, PolicyRecommendation, ClaimDecision    
- from api import ollama_llm
- from declarations import get_declarations_docs
+ from auto_insurance_claim.prompts import POLICY_RECOMMENDATION_PROMPT,\
+     GENERATE_POLICY_QUERIES_PROMPT
+ from auto_insurance_claim.schema import ClaimInfo, PolicyQueries, PolicyRecommendation, ClaimDecision    
+ from auto_insurance_claim.api import ollama_llm
+ from auto_insurance_claim.declarations import get_declarations_docs

87-87: Remove commented code.

There's commented code that appears to be redundant. Either add a comment explaining why it's kept or remove it.

- # docs = await self.policy_retriever.aretrieve(query)

44-148: Add docstrings to the workflow class and its methods.

The AutoInsuranceWorkflow class and its methods lack proper documentation. Adding docstrings would improve code readability and maintainability.

For example:

class AutoInsuranceWorkflow(Workflow):
    """
    Workflow for processing auto insurance claims.
    
    This workflow handles the entire lifecycle of an auto insurance claim:
    1. Loading claim information from a JSON file
    2. Generating policy queries based on the claim
    3. Retrieving relevant policy text
    4. Generating policy recommendations
    5. Finalizing the claim decision
    6. Outputting the result
    """
    
    @step
    async def load_claim_info(self, ctx: Context, ev: StartEvent) -> ClaimInfoEvent:
        """
        Load claim information from the provided JSON file.
        
        Args:
            ctx: The workflow context
            ev: The start event containing the claim_json_path
            
        Returns:
            ClaimInfoEvent with the parsed claim information
        """

38-43: Consider moving import statement to the top of the file.

The import json statement is inside the function body. While this works, it's generally considered better practice to place all imports at the top of the file.

+import json

def parse_claim(file_path: str) -> ClaimInfo:
-   import json
    with open(file_path, "r") as f:
        data = json.load(f)
    return ClaimInfo.model_validate(data)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bbf5f08 and d76f888.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • auto_insurance_claim/api.py (1 hunks)
  • auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • auto_insurance_claim/api.py
🔇 Additional comments (2)
auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py (2)

54-60: Validate the existence of claim_json_path before processing.

As noted in a previous review, the code doesn't validate that the claim_json_path exists before attempting to parse it, which could lead to runtime errors.

@step
async def load_claim_info(self, ctx: Context, ev: StartEvent) -> ClaimInfoEvent:
    if self._verbose:
        ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(msg=">> Loading Claim Info"))
+   import os
+   if not hasattr(ev, 'claim_json_path') or not ev.claim_json_path or not os.path.exists(ev.claim_json_path):
+       error_msg = f"Invalid or missing claim JSON path: {getattr(ev, 'claim_json_path', 'Not provided')}"
+       ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(msg=error_msg))
+       st.error(error_msg)
+       raise ValueError(error_msg)
    claim_info = parse_claim(ev.claim_json_path)
    await ctx.set("claim_info", claim_info)
    return ClaimInfoEvent(claim_info=claim_info)

128-131: Improved coverage detection implementation.

The implementation has been improved to address the previous review comment about substring-based coverage detection. The logic now correctly handles cases where "not covered" might appear in the recommendation summary.

Comment on lines +91 to +101
# also fetch the declarations page for the policy holder
declaration_doc = get_declarations_docs(claim_info.policy_number)
if declaration_doc:
d_doc = declaration_doc[0]
combined_docs[d_doc.id_] = d_doc
else:
ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(
msg=f"No declarations found for policy number: {claim_info.policy_number}"
))
st.warning(f"No declarations found for policy number: {claim_info.policy_number}")
policy_text = "\n\n".join([doc.get_content() for doc in combined_docs.values()])
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve error handling for declaration document retrieval.

The code handles the case when no declaration documents are found but doesn't handle potential exceptions from get_declarations_docs. Consider adding try-except blocks for better error handling.

# also fetch the declarations page for the policy holder
-declaration_doc = get_declarations_docs(claim_info.policy_number)
-if declaration_doc: 
-    d_doc = declaration_doc[0]
-    combined_docs[d_doc.id_] = d_doc
-else:
-    ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(
-       msg=f"No declarations found for policy number: {claim_info.policy_number}"
-    )) 
-    st.warning(f"No declarations found for policy number: {claim_info.policy_number}")
+try:
+    declaration_doc = get_declarations_docs(claim_info.policy_number)
+    if declaration_doc: 
+        d_doc = declaration_doc[0]
+        combined_docs[d_doc.id_] = d_doc
+    else:
+        warning_msg = f"No declarations found for policy number: {claim_info.policy_number}"
+        ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(msg=warning_msg)) 
+        st.warning(warning_msg)
+except Exception as e:
+    error_msg = f"Error retrieving declarations for policy {claim_info.policy_number}: {str(e)}"
+    ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(msg=error_msg))
+    st.error(error_msg)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# also fetch the declarations page for the policy holder
declaration_doc = get_declarations_docs(claim_info.policy_number)
if declaration_doc:
d_doc = declaration_doc[0]
combined_docs[d_doc.id_] = d_doc
else:
ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(
msg=f"No declarations found for policy number: {claim_info.policy_number}"
))
st.warning(f"No declarations found for policy number: {claim_info.policy_number}")
policy_text = "\n\n".join([doc.get_content() for doc in combined_docs.values()])
# also fetch the declarations page for the policy holder
try:
declaration_doc = get_declarations_docs(claim_info.policy_number)
if declaration_doc:
d_doc = declaration_doc[0]
combined_docs[d_doc.id_] = d_doc
else:
warning_msg = f"No declarations found for policy number: {claim_info.policy_number}"
ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(msg=warning_msg))
st.warning(warning_msg)
except Exception as e:
error_msg = f"Error retrieving declarations for policy {claim_info.policy_number}: {str(e)}"
ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(msg=error_msg))
st.error(error_msg)
policy_text = "\n\n".join([doc.get_content() for doc in combined_docs.values()])

Comment on lines 38 to 43
def parse_claim(file_path: str) -> ClaimInfo:
import json
with open(file_path, "r") as f:
data = json.load(f)
return ClaimInfo.model_validate(data) # replace "ClaimInfo".model_validate with actual ClaimInfo class method

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Clean up code comments and add error handling.

There's an explanatory comment that should be removed and there's no error handling for file operations.

def parse_claim(file_path: str) -> ClaimInfo:
    import json
+   if not file_path or not isinstance(file_path, str):
+       raise ValueError("Invalid file path provided")
    with open(file_path, "r") as f:
        data = json.load(f)
-   return ClaimInfo.model_validate(data)  # replace "ClaimInfo".model_validate with actual ClaimInfo class method
+   return ClaimInfo.model_validate(data)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
def parse_claim(file_path: str) -> ClaimInfo:
import json
with open(file_path, "r") as f:
data = json.load(f)
return ClaimInfo.model_validate(data) # replace "ClaimInfo".model_validate with actual ClaimInfo class method
def parse_claim(file_path: str) -> ClaimInfo:
import json
if not file_path or not isinstance(file_path, str):
raise ValueError("Invalid file path provided")
with open(file_path, "r") as f:
data = json.load(f)
return ClaimInfo.model_validate(data)

Comment on lines +47 to +53
policy_retriever: BaseRetriever,
llm: ollama_llm,
**kwargs
) -> None:
super().__init__(**kwargs)
self.policy_retriever = policy_retriever
self.llm = llm
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Add typehint for self._verbose and consider adding default values.

The _verbose attribute is used throughout the class but is not initialized in the constructor. Also, the ollama_llm parameter should use its proper class name rather than the module name.

def __init__(
    self, 
    policy_retriever: BaseRetriever, 
-   llm: ollama_llm,  
+   llm: 'ollama_llm.OllamaLLM',  
    **kwargs
) -> None:
    super().__init__(**kwargs)
    self.policy_retriever = policy_retriever
    self.llm = llm 
+   self._verbose = kwargs.get('verbose', False)

🌐 Web query:

What is the correct class name for Ollama LLM in llamaindex?

💡 Result:

The correct class name for using Ollama LLMs in LlamaIndex is Ollama, imported from llama_index.llms.ollama. This is consistently shown across multiple code examples and documentation sources[1][6][7][8][9].

Key implementation patterns include:

# Basic usage example
from llama_index.llms.ollama import Ollama
llm = Ollama(model="llama3.1:latest", request_timeout=120.0)

Notable features of the class:

  • Supports both synchronous and asynchronous operations[8]
  • Enables structured outputs through Pydantic integration[7][9]
  • Handles multi-modal capabilities for vision models[7]
  • Requires local Ollama server running on port 11434 by default[8]

The class documentation explicitly states: "Ollama LLM. Visit https://ollama.com/ to download and install Ollama"[8][9]. Examples demonstrate its use in agent workflows[1], structured output generation[7], and complex query engines[5].

Citations:


Update the constructor signature and attribute initialization

  • Replace the incorrect ollama_llm type hint with the correct class name Ollama (imported from llama_index.llms.ollama).
  • Initialize the _verbose attribute with a default boolean value and an explicit type hint.
+ from llama_index.llms.ollama import Ollama

 def __init__(
     self, 
     policy_retriever: BaseRetriever, 
-    llm: ollama_llm,  
+    llm: Ollama,  
     **kwargs
 ) -> None:
     super().__init__(**kwargs)
     self.policy_retriever = policy_retriever
     self.llm = llm 
+    self._verbose: bool = kwargs.get("verbose", False)

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py (3)

13-15: Use absolute imports for improved clarity and reliability.

Current imports from project modules use relative paths without explicitly indicating that they are local modules. This can potentially cause issues if there are name collisions with standard library or third-party packages.

-from prompts import POLICY_RECOMMENDATION_PROMPT,\
-    GENERATE_POLICY_QUERIES_PROMPT
-from schema import ClaimInfo, PolicyQueries, PolicyRecommendation, ClaimDecision    
-from api import ollama_llm
-from declarations import get_declarations_docs
+from auto_insurance_claim.prompts import POLICY_RECOMMENDATION_PROMPT,\
+    GENERATE_POLICY_QUERIES_PROMPT
+from auto_insurance_claim.schema import ClaimInfo, PolicyQueries, PolicyRecommendation, ClaimDecision    
+from auto_insurance_claim.api import ollama_llm
+from auto_insurance_claim.declarations import get_declarations_docs

155-158: Consider providing better context in the output result.

The final output only includes the decision without additional context that might be useful for debugging or logging purposes. Consider adding the claim information and some policy details to provide a more comprehensive result.

@step
async def output_result(self, ctx: Context, ev: DecisionEvent) -> StopEvent:
    if self._verbose:
        st.info(f">> Decision: {ev.decision.model_dump_json()}")
-   return StopEvent(result={"decision": ev.decision})
+   claim_info = await ctx.get("claim_info")
+   return StopEvent(result={
+       "decision": ev.decision,
+       "claim_info": claim_info.model_dump(),
+       "timestamp": datetime.datetime.now().isoformat()
+   })

69-70: Inconsistent use of logging mechanisms.

The workflow uses a mix of ctx.write_event_to_stream() and st.info() for logging verbose information. This inconsistency can make debugging and monitoring more difficult. Consider standardizing on one approach.

# Example for one location
@step
async def finalize_decision(self, ctx: Context, ev: RecommendationEvent) -> DecisionEvent:
    if self._verbose:
-       st.info("Finalizing Decision")
+       ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(msg=">> Finalizing Decision"))
    # ...

Also applies to: 77-78, 89-90, 118-119, 134-135, 156-157

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d76f888 and 5573e60.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
auto_insurance_claim/workflows.py (6)

39-43: Add error handling and validation to parse_claim function.

The parse_claim function lacks error handling for file operations and validation of the file path. This could lead to runtime errors if the file doesn't exist or contains invalid JSON.

def parse_claim(file_path: str) -> ClaimInfo:
+   if not file_path or not isinstance(file_path, str):
+       raise ValueError("Invalid file path provided")
    
-   with open(file_path, "r") as f:
-       data = json.load(f)
-   return ClaimInfo.model_validate(data)  # replace "ClaimInfo".model_validate with actual ClaimInfo class method
+   try:
+       with open(file_path, "r") as f:
+           data = json.load(f)
+       return ClaimInfo.model_validate(data)
+   except FileNotFoundError:
+       raise FileNotFoundError(f"Claim file not found: {file_path}")
+   except json.JSONDecodeError:
+       raise ValueError(f"Invalid JSON format in file: {file_path}")

57-65: Improve constructor signature and initialize _verbose attribute.

The _verbose attribute is used in several methods but never initialized. Additionally, the type hint for llm should use the correct class name rather than the module name.

def __init__(
    self, 
    policy_retriever: BaseRetriever, 
-   llm: ollama_llm,  
+   llm: 'ollama_llm.OllamaLLM',  
    **kwargs
) -> None:
    super().__init__(**kwargs)
    self.policy_retriever = policy_retriever
    self.llm = llm 
+   self._verbose: bool = kwargs.get("verbose", False)

68-73: Validate claim_json_path before processing.

The method doesn't validate whether ev.claim_json_path exists or is valid before passing it to parse_claim(). While error handling in higher levels might catch issues, early validation would improve robustness.

@step
async def load_claim_info(self, ctx: Context, ev: StartEvent) -> ClaimInfoEvent:
    if self._verbose:
        ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(msg=">> Loading Claim Info"))
+   # Validate claim_json_path
+   if not hasattr(ev, 'claim_json_path') or not ev.claim_json_path:
+       error_msg = "No claim_json_path provided in StartEvent"
+       ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(msg=error_msg))
+       raise ValueError(error_msg)
    claim_info = parse_claim(ev.claim_json_path)
    await ctx.set("claim_info", claim_info)
    return ClaimInfoEvent(claim_info=claim_info)

102-112: Improve error handling for declaration document retrieval.

The code doesn't handle potential exceptions from get_declarations_docs(). This operation could fail for various reasons (network issues, database errors, etc.) and should be wrapped in a try-except block.

# also fetch the declarations page for the policy holder
-declaration_doc = get_declarations_docs(claim_info.policy_number)
-if declaration_doc: 
-    d_doc = declaration_doc[0]
-    combined_docs[d_doc.id_] = d_doc
-else:
-    ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(
-       msg=f"No declarations found for policy number: {claim_info.policy_number}"
-    )) 
-    st.warning(f"No declarations found for policy number: {claim_info.policy_number}")
+try:
+    declaration_doc = get_declarations_docs(claim_info.policy_number)
+    if declaration_doc: 
+        d_doc = declaration_doc[0]
+        combined_docs[d_doc.id_] = d_doc
+    else:
+        warning_msg = f"No declarations found for policy number: {claim_info.policy_number}"
+        ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(msg=warning_msg)) 
+        st.warning(warning_msg)
+except Exception as e:
+    error_msg = f"Error retrieving declarations for policy {claim_info.policy_number}: {str(e)}"
+    ctx.write_event_to_stream(LogEvent(msg=error_msg))
+    st.error(error_msg)

138-142: Coverage detection logic implemented correctly.

The coverage detection logic has been improved to properly handle negated expressions like "not covered" when checking for claim coverage. This is an effective solution to prevent false positives.


45-56: Well-documented workflow class with clear step definitions.

The AutoInsuranceWorkflow class has a comprehensive docstring explaining the claim processing workflow steps clearly. The documentation provides good context and makes the code more maintainable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant