Skip to content

ROB: Consider root objects without catalog type as fallback #3175

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2025

Conversation

stefan6419846
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #3164.

@stefan6419846 stefan6419846 changed the title ROB: Consider root objects with catalog type as fallback ROB: Consider root objects without catalog type as fallback Mar 12, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.51%. Comparing base (432b238) to head (c17f4e0).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3175      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.53%   96.51%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          53       53              
  Lines        8924     8927       +3     
  Branches     1636     1637       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         8615     8616       +1     
- Misses        185      187       +2     
  Partials      124      124              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@stefan6419846 stefan6419846 merged commit a86c319 into py-pdf:main Mar 13, 2025
16 of 17 checks passed
@stefan6419846 stefan6419846 deleted the issue3164 branch March 13, 2025 07:41
stefan6419846 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2025
## What's new

### New Features (ENH)
- Add support for `IndirectObject.__contains__` (#3155) by @noamkush

### Bug Fixes (BUG)
- Fix detection of inline images followed by names or numbers (#3173) by @stefan6419846

### Robustness (ROB)
- Consider root objects without catalog type as fallback (#3175) by @stefan6419846
- Raise proper error on infinite loop when reading objects (#3169) by @stefan6419846

### Documentation (DOC)
- Mention memory consumption of text extraction (#3168) by @stefan6419846

### Developer Experience (DEV)
- Upgrade to ruff 0.10.0 (#3191) by @stefan6419846

[Full Changelog](5.3.1...5.4.0)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Handling of root objects without a Type
1 participant