Skip to content

nit: Fix wrong example code in comment #18860

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2025
Merged

Conversation

real-or-random
Copy link
Contributor

"posix" is not a valid value for sys.platform

Found when researching about python/typing#1732.
I hope it's okay to send a trivial PR. If you don't want to bother with this, feel free to close this.

"posix" is not a valid value for sys.platform
Copy link
Contributor

According to mypy_primer, this change doesn't affect type check results on a corpus of open source code. ✅

Copy link
Collaborator

@cdce8p cdce8p left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@cdce8p cdce8p added the upnext label Mar 31, 2025
@JukkaL JukkaL merged commit 7846464 into python:master Mar 31, 2025
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants