-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Highfive on libc provides incorrect contributing information #39704
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Also, please consider updating the "Pull Requests" section in the contributing information to make it clear that each submodule of rust (for reasons unclear to me) has its own contribution process. |
FWIW I don't think there's much to do here for this repo specifically, we don't actually want to force our own style guidelines on all other repos we use. The motivation for this report, however, I think is quite relevant! Namely we should probably tweak the contributing guidelines to at least mention that they're targeted at rust-lang/rust. Otherwise because rust-highfive is running on a bunch of other repos it may be confusing with the same message across all of them. @nrc do you know if it'd be possible for rust-highfive to have a tweaked message across repositories? |
I think, at a minimum, it'd be helpful to make the relationship between rust-lang/rust and the other submodules clearer. From a person new to contributing to rust, "it's all one project". It's very confusing when you discover that they're not. Briefly explaining that relationship and mentioning that each has its own contribution process would help immensely, as would tweaking the message from the bot. Thanks for your kind consideration. |
This would be very easy to implement |
@binarycrusader yeah definitely! @nrc I believe all the relevant configuration is in your highfive repo right? And it looks like the message specifically for new PRs would be in newpr.py? |
@alexcrichton yes and yes |
I believe we should add a dedicated |
Triage: highfive on libc now displays the contributing.md on the repo as expected (e.g. rust-lang/libc#1974 (comment)). |
As a new contributor, I was surprised to discover that running tidy via 'x.py src/tools/tidy' at the top-level was not sufficient to check changes in submodules.
Please consider adding a recursive option that understands the rules of each submodule and runs the appropriate style check.
If this already exists somehow, my apologies.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: