Rebase #19385 #20141
Merged
Rebase #19385 #20141
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There ain’t an RFC 248, while 438 looks to be what is being referred to: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0438-precedence-of-plus.md
|
r? @pnkfelix (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
Thanks! |
alexcrichton
added a commit
to alexcrichton/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2014
RFC 248? I think you meant RFC 438. There ain’t an RFC 248, while 438 looks to be what is being referred to: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0438-precedence-of-plus.md -------------- Chis Morgan has a pretty important documentation fix in rust-lang#19385 and he hasn't responded in a while to that pull request so I rebased it for him Closes rust-lang#19385
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
RFC 248? I think you meant RFC 438.
There ain’t an RFC 248, while 438 looks to be what is being referred to:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0438-precedence-of-plus.md
Chis Morgan has a pretty important documentation fix in #19385 and he hasn't responded in a while to that pull request so I rebased it for him
Closes #19385