-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Fix comment typo in once.rs #83740
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix comment typo in once.rs #83740
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @joshtriplett (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 2e4215c has been approved by |
Fix comment typo in once.rs I believe I came across a minor typo in a comment. I am not particularly familiar with this part of the codebase, but I have read the surrounding code as well as the referenced `park` and `unpark` functions, and I believe my proposed change is true to the intended meaning of the comment. I intentionally tried to keep the change as minimal as possible. If I have the maintainers' permission, I'd also love to add a comma to improve readability as follows: `Luckily ``park`` comes with the guarantee that if it got an ``unpark`` just before on an unparked thread, it does not park.`
Fix comment typo in once.rs I believe I came across a minor typo in a comment. I am not particularly familiar with this part of the codebase, but I have read the surrounding code as well as the referenced `park` and `unpark` functions, and I believe my proposed change is true to the intended meaning of the comment. I intentionally tried to keep the change as minimal as possible. If I have the maintainers' permission, I'd also love to add a comma to improve readability as follows: `Luckily ``park`` comes with the guarantee that if it got an ``unpark`` just before on an unparked thread, it does not park.`
Fix comment typo in once.rs I believe I came across a minor typo in a comment. I am not particularly familiar with this part of the codebase, but I have read the surrounding code as well as the referenced `park` and `unpark` functions, and I believe my proposed change is true to the intended meaning of the comment. I intentionally tried to keep the change as minimal as possible. If I have the maintainers' permission, I'd also love to add a comma to improve readability as follows: `Luckily ``park`` comes with the guarantee that if it got an ``unpark`` just before on an unparked thread, it does not park.`
Fix comment typo in once.rs I believe I came across a minor typo in a comment. I am not particularly familiar with this part of the codebase, but I have read the surrounding code as well as the referenced `park` and `unpark` functions, and I believe my proposed change is true to the intended meaning of the comment. I intentionally tried to keep the change as minimal as possible. If I have the maintainers' permission, I'd also love to add a comma to improve readability as follows: `Luckily ``park`` comes with the guarantee that if it got an ``unpark`` just before on an unparked thread, it does not park.`
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#83535 (Break when there is a mismatch in the type count) - rust-lang#83721 (Add a button to copy the "use statement") - rust-lang#83740 (Fix comment typo in once.rs) - rust-lang#83745 (Add my new email address to .mailmap) - rust-lang#83754 (Add test to ensure search tabs behaviour) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
I believe I came across a minor typo in a comment. I am not particularly familiar with this part of the codebase, but I have read the surrounding code as well as the referenced
park
andunpark
functions, and I believe my proposed change is true to the intended meaning of the comment.I intentionally tried to keep the change as minimal as possible. If I have the maintainers' permission, I'd also love to add a comma to improve readability as follows:
Luckily ``park`` comes with the guarantee that if it got an ``unpark`` just before on an unparked thread, it does not park.