Skip to content

Implement a subset of all intrinsics #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
45 of 47 tasks
bjorn3 opened this issue Jul 21, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed
45 of 47 tasks

Implement a subset of all intrinsics #1

bjorn3 opened this issue Jul 21, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.
Milestone

Comments

@bjorn3
Copy link
Member

bjorn3 commented Jul 21, 2018

Constants

  • size_of
  • min_align_of
  • needs_drop
  • type_id
  • type_name

Needed for libcore and libstd

  • abort
  • copy
  • copy_nonoverlapping
  • transmute
  • uninit
  • offset
  • unchecked_*
  • overflowing_*
  • *_with_overflow
  • disciminant_value
  • assume
  • (un)likely
  • ctlz_nonzero
  • size_of_val
  • min_align_of_val
  • arith_offset
  • bitreverse
  • bswap
  • saturating_sub

Needed for liballoc

  • write_bytes

Atomics

They are not atomic yet.

  • atomic_cxchg_*
  • atomic_fence_*
  • atomic_load_*
  • atomic_store_*
  • atomic_xadd_*
  • atomic_xsub_*

Needed for libtest

  • fabsf64
  • maxnumf64
  • sqrtf64
  • floorf64
  • minnumf64
  • try (libtest needs panic_unwind)

Misc

  • volatile_{load,store}
  • pref_align_of
  • powif64
  • truncf64
  • fmaf64
  • roundf64
  • logf64
  • sinf64
  • f*_fast
  • volatile_copy_memory
@bjorn3 bjorn3 added this to the MVP milestone Jul 21, 2018
@bjorn3 bjorn3 added the C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. label Jul 27, 2019
bjorn3 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2019
[BENCH COMPILE] ebobby/simple-raytracer
Benchmark #1: RUSTFLAGS='' cargo build --target x86_64-apple-darwin
  Time (mean ± σ):     16.539 s ±  0.781 s    [User: 46.043 s, System: 3.822 s]
  Range (min … max):   15.057 s … 17.566 s    10 runs

Benchmark #2: ../cargo.sh build
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.550 s ±  0.443 s    [User: 25.856 s, System: 4.214 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.208 s … 15.751 s    10 runs

Summary
  '../cargo.sh build' ran
    1.14 ± 0.06 times faster than 'RUSTFLAGS='' cargo build --target x86_64-apple-darwin'
[BENCH RUN] ebobby/simple-raytracer
Benchmark #1: ./raytracer_cg_llvm
  Time (mean ± σ):      6.436 s ±  0.022 s    [User: 6.392 s, System: 0.018 s]
  Range (min … max):    6.408 s …  6.466 s    10 runs

Benchmark #2: ./raytracer_cg_clif
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.604 s ±  0.088 s    [User: 9.547 s, System: 0.023 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.503 s …  9.742 s    10 runs

Summary
  './raytracer_cg_llvm' ran
    1.49 ± 0.01 times faster than './raytracer_cg_clif'
bjorn3 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2019
* Only format global _comments when debug_assertions are enabled
* Only call build_value_labels_ranges in base.rs when debug_assertions are enabled

Benchmark #1: CHANNEL='pre' ../cargo.sh build
  Time (mean ± σ):     17.657 s ±  1.050 s    [User: 31.871 s, System: 3.014 s]
  Range (min … max):   16.907 s … 20.394 s    10 runs

Benchmark #2: ../cargo.sh build
  Time (mean ± σ):     16.640 s ±  0.255 s    [User: 30.238 s, System: 2.965 s]
  Range (min … max):   16.413 s … 17.186 s    10 runs

  Warning: Statistical outliers were detected. Consider re-running this benchmark on a quiet PC without any interferences from other programs. It might help to use the '--warmup' or '--prepare' options.

Summary
  '../cargo.sh build' ran
    1.06 ± 0.07 times faster than 'CHANNEL='pre' ../cargo.sh build'
bjorn3 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2019
* Only format global _comments when debug_assertions are enabled
* Only call build_value_labels_ranges in base.rs when debug_assertions are enabled

Benchmark #1: CHANNEL='pre' ../cargo.sh build
  Time (mean ± σ):     17.657 s ±  1.050 s    [User: 31.871 s, System: 3.014 s]
  Range (min … max):   16.907 s … 20.394 s    10 runs

Benchmark #2: ../cargo.sh build
  Time (mean ± σ):     16.640 s ±  0.255 s    [User: 30.238 s, System: 2.965 s]
  Range (min … max):   16.413 s … 17.186 s    10 runs

  Warning: Statistical outliers were detected. Consider re-running this benchmark on a quiet PC without any interferences from other programs. It might help to use the '--warmup' or '--prepare' options.

Summary
  '../cargo.sh build' ran
    1.06 ± 0.07 times faster than 'CHANNEL='pre' ../cargo.sh build'
bjorn3 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2019
* Only format global _comments when debug_assertions are enabled
* Only call build_value_labels_ranges in base.rs when debug_assertions are enabled

Benchmark #1: CHANNEL='pre' ../cargo.sh build
  Time (mean ± σ):     17.657 s ±  1.050 s    [User: 31.871 s, System: 3.014 s]
  Range (min … max):   16.907 s … 20.394 s    10 runs

Benchmark #2: ../cargo.sh build
  Time (mean ± σ):     16.640 s ±  0.255 s    [User: 30.238 s, System: 2.965 s]
  Range (min … max):   16.413 s … 17.186 s    10 runs

  Warning: Statistical outliers were detected. Consider re-running this benchmark on a quiet PC without any interferences from other programs. It might help to use the '--warmup' or '--prepare' options.

Summary
  '../cargo.sh build' ran
    1.06 ± 0.07 times faster than 'CHANNEL='pre' ../cargo.sh build'
bjorn3 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2019
Benchmark #1: ./simple_raytracer_before
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.420 s ±  0.568 s    [User: 14.376 s, System: 0.026 s]
  Range (min … max):   13.730 s … 15.170 s    10 runs

Benchmark #2: simple_raytracer_after
  Time (mean ± σ):     13.679 s ±  0.576 s    [User: 13.628 s, System: 0.020 s]
  Range (min … max):   12.761 s … 14.552 s    10 runs

Summary
  './simple_raytracer_after' ran
    1.05 ± 0.06 times faster than './simple_raytracer_before'
@bjorn3
Copy link
Member Author

bjorn3 commented Dec 24, 2019

All intrinsics necessary for most programs are implemented.

@bjorn3 bjorn3 closed this as completed Dec 24, 2019
bjorn3 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2020
Fixes #836

Benchmark #1: simple-raytracer/raytracer_cg_clif
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.250 s ±  0.056 s    [User: 9.213 s, System: 0.015 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.151 s …  9.348 s    20 runs

Benchmark #2: simple-raytracer/raytracer_cg_clif_cold_separated
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.179 s ±  0.101 s    [User: 9.141 s, System: 0.016 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.070 s …  9.473 s    20 runs

Summary
  'simple-raytracer/raytracer_cg_clif_cold_separated' ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than 'simple-raytracer/raytracer_cg_clif'
bjorn3 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 23, 2020
Benchmark #1: ./raytracer_cg_clif_pre
  Time (mean ± σ):      8.251 s ±  0.021 s    [User: 8.245 s, System: 0.005 s]
  Range (min … max):    8.225 s …  8.292 s    10 runs

Benchmark #2: ./raytracer_cg_clif_post
  Time (mean ± σ):      8.206 s ±  0.043 s    [User: 8.199 s, System: 0.007 s]
  Range (min … max):    8.168 s …  8.279 s    10 runs
bjorn3 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2020
```
Benchmark #1: ./raytracer_cg_clif_pre
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.553 s ±  0.129 s    [User: 9.543 s, System: 0.008 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.438 s …  9.837 s    10 runs

Benchmark #2: ./raytracer_cg_clif_post
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.463 s ±  0.055 s    [User: 9.452 s, System: 0.008 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.387 s …  9.518 s    10 runs

Summary
  './raytracer_cg_clif_post' ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than './raytracer_cg_clif_pre'
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant