-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Postpone fragile tests and run them one by one #187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
feature
A new functionality
Comments
Totktonada
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 26, 2019
Added "fragile" option to suite.ini file format. The option lists tests that are not desined be run in parallel with others: say, those ones that lean of timings that are meet only when enough system resources are available. The option set in the same way as "disabled" and other test lists: | fragile = foo.test.lua ; gh-1234 | bar.test.lua ; gh-5678 Fixes #187.
Merged
Totktonada
added a commit
to tarantool/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Sep 24, 2020
Retry a failed test when it is marked as fragile (and several other conditions are met, see below). The test-run already allows to set a list of fragile tests. They are run one-by-one after all parallel ones in order to eliminate possible resource starvation and fit timings to ones when the tests pass. See [1]. In practice this approach does not help much against our problem with flaky tests. We decided to retry failed tests, when they are known as flagile. See [2]. The core idea is to split responsibility: known flaky fails will not deflect attention of a developer, but each fragile test will be marked explicitly, trackerized and will be analyzed by the quality assurance team. The default behaviour is not changed: each test from the fragile list will be run once after all parallel ones. But now it is possible to set retries amount. Beware: the implementation does not allow to just set retries count, it also requires to provide an md5sum of a failed test output (so called reject file). The idea here is to ensure that we retry the test only in case of a known fail: not some other fail within the test. This approach has the limitation: in case of fail a test may output an information that varies from run to run or depend of a base directory. We should always verify the output before put its checksum into the configuration file. Despite doubts regarding this approach, it looks simple and we decided to try and revisit it if there will be a need. See configuration example in [3]. [1]: tarantool/test-run#187 [2]: tarantool/test-run#189 [3]: tarantool/test-run#217 Part of #5050
Totktonada
added a commit
to tarantool/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Sep 24, 2020
Retry a failed test when it is marked as fragile (and several other conditions are met, see below). The test-run already allows to set a list of fragile tests. They are run one-by-one after all parallel ones in order to eliminate possible resource starvation and fit timings to ones when the tests pass. See [1]. In practice this approach does not help much against our problem with flaky tests. We decided to retry failed tests, when they are known as flagile. See [2]. The core idea is to split responsibility: known flaky fails will not deflect attention of a developer, but each fragile test will be marked explicitly, trackerized and will be analyzed by the quality assurance team. The default behaviour is not changed: each test from the fragile list will be run once after all parallel ones. But now it is possible to set retries amount. Beware: the implementation does not allow to just set retries count, it also requires to provide an md5sum of a failed test output (so called reject file). The idea here is to ensure that we retry the test only in case of a known fail: not some other fail within the test. This approach has the limitation: in case of fail a test may output an information that varies from run to run or depend of a base directory. We should always verify the output before put its checksum into the configuration file. Despite doubts regarding this approach, it looks simple and we decided to try and revisit it if there will be a need. See configuration example in [3]. [1]: tarantool/test-run#187 [2]: tarantool/test-run#189 [3]: tarantool/test-run#217 Part of #5050 (cherry picked from commit 43482ee)
Totktonada
added a commit
to tarantool/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Sep 24, 2020
Retry a failed test when it is marked as fragile (and several other conditions are met, see below). The test-run already allows to set a list of fragile tests. They are run one-by-one after all parallel ones in order to eliminate possible resource starvation and fit timings to ones when the tests pass. See [1]. In practice this approach does not help much against our problem with flaky tests. We decided to retry failed tests, when they are known as flagile. See [2]. The core idea is to split responsibility: known flaky fails will not deflect attention of a developer, but each fragile test will be marked explicitly, trackerized and will be analyzed by the quality assurance team. The default behaviour is not changed: each test from the fragile list will be run once after all parallel ones. But now it is possible to set retries amount. Beware: the implementation does not allow to just set retries count, it also requires to provide an md5sum of a failed test output (so called reject file). The idea here is to ensure that we retry the test only in case of a known fail: not some other fail within the test. This approach has the limitation: in case of fail a test may output an information that varies from run to run or depend of a base directory. We should always verify the output before put its checksum into the configuration file. Despite doubts regarding this approach, it looks simple and we decided to try and revisit it if there will be a need. See configuration example in [3]. [1]: tarantool/test-run#187 [2]: tarantool/test-run#189 [3]: tarantool/test-run#217 Part of #5050 (cherry picked from commit 43482ee)
Totktonada
added a commit
to tarantool/tarantool
that referenced
this issue
Sep 24, 2020
Retry a failed test when it is marked as fragile (and several other conditions are met, see below). The test-run already allows to set a list of fragile tests. They are run one-by-one after all parallel ones in order to eliminate possible resource starvation and fit timings to ones when the tests pass. See [1]. In practice this approach does not help much against our problem with flaky tests. We decided to retry failed tests, when they are known as flagile. See [2]. The core idea is to split responsibility: known flaky fails will not deflect attention of a developer, but each fragile test will be marked explicitly, trackerized and will be analyzed by the quality assurance team. The default behaviour is not changed: each test from the fragile list will be run once after all parallel ones. But now it is possible to set retries amount. Beware: the implementation does not allow to just set retries count, it also requires to provide an md5sum of a failed test output (so called reject file). The idea here is to ensure that we retry the test only in case of a known fail: not some other fail within the test. This approach has the limitation: in case of fail a test may output an information that varies from run to run or depend of a base directory. We should always verify the output before put its checksum into the configuration file. Despite doubts regarding this approach, it looks simple and we decided to try and revisit it if there will be a need. See configuration example in [3]. [1]: tarantool/test-run#187 [2]: tarantool/test-run#189 [3]: tarantool/test-run#217 Part of #5050 (cherry picked from commit 43482ee)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Just like we doing for
is_parallel = False
test suites. It hopefully will allow us to overcome flaky test fails without test cases disabling.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: