docs: fix typos and improve clarity in contribution guidelines #1634
+22
−26
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1634 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 96.15% 96.50% +0.34%
==========================================
Files 10 10
Lines 1196 1201 +5
Branches 461 460 -1
==========================================
+ Hits 1150 1159 +9
Misses 37 37
+ Partials 9 5 -4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
snitin315
reviewed
May 18, 2025
.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| - version of Webpack used | ||
| - version of the loader / plugin you are creating a bug report for | ||
| - the use-case that fails | ||
|
|
||
| A minimal reproduce scenario allows us to quickly confirm a bug (or point out config problems) as well as confirm that we are fixing the right problem. | ||
|
|
||
| We will be insisting on a minimal reproduce scenario in order to save maintainers time and ultimately be able to fix more bugs. We understand that sometimes it might be hard to extract essentials bits of code from a larger code-base but we really need to isolate the problem before we can fix it. | ||
| We will be insisting on a minimal reproduce scenario in order to save maintainers time and ultimately be able to fix more bugs. We understand that sometimes it might be hard to extract essential bits of code from a larger codebase but we really need to isolate the problem before we can fix it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| We will be insisting on a minimal reproduce scenario in order to save maintainers time and ultimately be able to fix more bugs. We understand that sometimes it might be hard to extract essential bits of code from a larger codebase but we really need to isolate the problem before we can fix it. | |
| We will be insisting on a minimal reproduction scenario in order to save maintainers' time and ultimately be able to fix more bugs. We understand that sometimes it might be hard to extract essential bits of code from a larger codebase, but we really need to isolate the problem before we can fix it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains a:
Motivation / Use-Case
fix typos and improve clarity in contribution guidelines, corrected grammatical issues, improved sentence structure, and refined formatting across the contribution guidelines in README.md
Breaking Changes
No
Additional Info
No