Kernel panic #3673
Assignees
Labels
type/bug
Something isn't working
Comments
3 tasks
|
Seems like a kernel/ebpf subsystem bug.
Will you be able to share your kernel+modules so we could try reproducing it? |
Yes, It's coroot.
I use Talos v1.8.2 (Linux 6.6.58) built on factory.talos.dev with following configuration: customization:
extraKernelArgs:
- console=ttyS0,115200n8r
- -lockdown
- lockdown=integrity
- cpufreq.default_governor=performance
- amd_pstate=active
- mitigations=off
- iommu=off
systemExtensions:
officialExtensions:
- siderolabs/amd-ucode
- siderolabs/amdgpu-firmware
- siderolabs/drbd |
|
@maxpain would you be able to test a kernel patch? |
It would not be easy since I built Talos Linux images using factory.talos.dev and Secure Boot. I think the panic could be caused by Puppeteer (chrome for developers) pods in my cluster. I can reproduce it on another hardware. |
|
Would you be able to test this one? |
|
I can reproduce with following running in separate terminals looks like we have a fix already, will send out shortly |
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code.
The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf
profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered
within uprobe_free_utask function:
- after current->utask is freed and
- before current->utask is set to NULL
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80
...
? die_addr+0x36/0x90
? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420
? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30
? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80
perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360
get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0
bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90
bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b
? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120
bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110
...
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350
...
? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80
? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220
uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80
mm_release+0x12/0xb0
do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0
__x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80
It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in
separate terminals:
# while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done
# bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }'
Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL
before we start to release the utask object.
[1] grafana/pyroscope#3673
Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
|
@olsajiri found a better variant which does not incur an additional runtime check, got submitted here: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org/ |
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
to kernel-patches/bpf-rc
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
to kernel-patches/bpf
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
to kernel-patches/bpf-rc
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
to kernel-patches/bpf
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
to kernel-patches/bpf
that referenced
this issue
Jan 10, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
to kernel-patches/bpf-rc
that referenced
this issue
Jan 10, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 10, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code.
The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf
profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered
within uprobe_free_utask function:
- after current->utask is freed and
- before current->utask is set to NULL
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80
...
? die_addr+0x36/0x90
? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420
? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30
? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80
perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360
get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0
bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90
bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b
? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120
bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110
...
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350
...
? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80
? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220
uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80
mm_release+0x12/0xb0
do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0
__x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80
It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in
separate terminals:
# while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done
# bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }'
Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL
before we start to release the utask object.
[1] grafana/pyroscope#3673
Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe")
Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org
tacitness
pushed a commit
to tacitness/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 20, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code.
The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf
profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered
within uprobe_free_utask function:
- after current->utask is freed and
- before current->utask is set to NULL
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80
...
? die_addr+0x36/0x90
? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420
? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30
? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80
perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360
get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0
bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90
bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b
? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120
bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110
...
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350
...
? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80
? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220
uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80
mm_release+0x12/0xb0
do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0
__x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80
It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in
separate terminals:
# while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done
# bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }'
Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL
before we start to release the utask object.
[1] grafana/pyroscope#3673
Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe")
Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org
tacitness
pushed a commit
to tacitness/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 20, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code.
The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf
profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered
within uprobe_free_utask function:
- after current->utask is freed and
- before current->utask is set to NULL
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80
...
? die_addr+0x36/0x90
? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420
? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30
? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80
perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360
get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0
bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90
bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b
? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120
bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110
...
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350
...
? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80
? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220
uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80
mm_release+0x12/0xb0
do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0
__x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80
It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in
separate terminals:
# while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done
# bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }'
Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL
before we start to release the utask object.
[1] grafana/pyroscope#3673
Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe")
Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org
opsiff
pushed a commit
to opsiff/UOS-kernel
that referenced
this issue
Feb 25, 2025
mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.13-rc1 commit b583ef8 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IB0MX4 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=b583ef82b671c9a752fbe3e95bd4c1c51eab764d -------------------------------- Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org (cherry picked from commit b583ef8) Conflicts: kernel/events/uprobes.c [ Context changed in 430af82 ("uprobes: kill the unnecessary put_uprobe/xol_free_insn_slot in uprobe_free_utask() ")] Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>
wanghao75
pushed a commit
to openeuler-mirror/kernel
that referenced
this issue
Mar 3, 2025
mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.13-rc1 commit b583ef82b671c9a752fbe3e95bd4c1c51eab764d category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IB0MX4 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=b583ef82b671c9a752fbe3e95bd4c1c51eab764d -------------------------------- Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d2c526 ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org (cherry picked from commit b583ef82b671c9a752fbe3e95bd4c1c51eab764d) Conflicts: kernel/events/uprobes.c [ Context changed in 430af825ba99 ("uprobes: kill the unnecessary put_uprobe/xol_free_insn_slot in uprobe_free_utask() ")] Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>
|
We are aware that lts kernel versions 6.1.y starting with 6.1.113 and 6.6.y starting with 6.6.55 have this uprobe regression. I proposed adding the fix to the stable kernel: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/f32da38f-d313-48ed-9ca6-7da210b08f8b@swine.de/T/#u Those versions are also in running in some EKS and GKE nodes. I am working to let the respective teams know and fix this. |
opsiff
pushed a commit
to deepin-community/kernel
that referenced
this issue
Mar 6, 2025
mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.13-rc1 commit b583ef8 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IB0MX4 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=b583ef82b671c9a752fbe3e95bd4c1c51eab764d -------------------------------- Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org (cherry picked from commit b583ef8) Conflicts: kernel/events/uprobes.c [ Context changed in 430af82 ("uprobes: kill the unnecessary put_uprobe/xol_free_insn_slot in uprobe_free_utask() ")] Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>
mngyadam
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 7, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
paniakin-aws
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 8, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
shaoyingxu
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 8, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to anon503/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 10, 2025
commit b583ef8 upstream. Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [Christian Simon: Rebased for 6.12.y, due to mainline change https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240929144239.GA9475@redhat.com/] Signed-off-by: Christian Simon <simon@swine.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to anon503/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 10, 2025
commit b583ef8 upstream. Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [Christian Simon: Rebased for 6.12.y, due to mainline change https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240929144239.GA9475@redhat.com/] Signed-off-by: Christian Simon <simon@swine.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
johnny-mnemonic
pushed a commit
to linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2025
commit b583ef8 upstream. Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [Christian Simon: Rebased for 6.12.y, due to mainline change https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240929144239.GA9475@redhat.com/] Signed-off-by: Christian Simon <simon@swine.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to anon503/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2025
commit b583ef8 upstream. Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [Christian Simon: Rebased for 6.12.y, due to mainline change https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240929144239.GA9475@redhat.com/] Signed-off-by: Christian Simon <simon@swine.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
paniakin-aws
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 12, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
paniakin-aws
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 12, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
paniakin-aws
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 12, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
paniakin-aws
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 13, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
Whissi
pushed a commit
to Whissi/linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Mar 13, 2025
commit b583ef8 upstream. Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [Christian Simon: Rebased for 6.12.y, due to mainline change https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240929144239.GA9475@redhat.com/] Signed-off-by: Christian Simon <simon@swine.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to sirdarckcat/linux-1
that referenced
this issue
Mar 13, 2025
commit b583ef8 upstream. Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [gregkh#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [Christian Simon: Rebased for 6.12.y, due to mainline change https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240929144239.GA9475@redhat.com/] Signed-off-by: Christian Simon <simon@swine.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gregkh
pushed a commit
to gregkh/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 13, 2025
commit b583ef8 upstream. Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [Christian Simon: Rebased for 6.12.y, due to mainline change https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240929144239.GA9475@redhat.com/] Signed-off-by: Christian Simon <simon@swine.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
paniakin-aws
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 13, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
paniakin-aws
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 15, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
paniakin-aws
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
heynemax
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
paniakin-aws
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
hagarhem
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 20, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
mngyadam
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 21, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
paniakin-aws
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
paniakin-aws
pushed a commit
to amazonlinux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [fixed contextual changes] Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@amazon.com>
oraclelinuxkernel
pushed a commit
to oracle/linux-uek
that referenced
this issue
Apr 14, 2025
commit b583ef8 upstream. Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [Christian Simon: Rebased for 6.12.y, due to mainline change https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240929144239.GA9475@redhat.com/] Signed-off-by: Christian Simon <simon@swine.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> (cherry picked from commit 86b7ebddab03bcb2b738eb07fe4a751bd82abab9) Signed-off-by: Jack Vogel <jack.vogel@oracle.com>
KexyBiscuit
pushed a commit
to AOSC-Tracking/ubuntu-kernel-next-linux
that referenced
this issue
Apr 19, 2025
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104210 commit b583ef8 upstream. Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [Christian Simon: Rebased for 6.12.y, due to mainline change https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240929144239.GA9475@redhat.com/] Signed-off-by: Christian Simon <simon@swine.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> (cherry-picked from commit eff00c5e29abfc919a0647cb85c5ac6a5d6e1f0a linux-6.6.y) Signed-off-by: Krister Johansen <kjlx@templeofstupid.com> Acked-by: Massimiliano Pellizzer <massimiliano.pellizzer@canonical.com> Acked-by: Kuba Pawlak <kuba.pawlak@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Mehmet Basaran <mehmet.basaran@canonical.com>
tuxedo-bot
pushed a commit
to tuxedocomputers/linux
that referenced
this issue
Apr 22, 2025
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104210 commit b583ef8 upstream. Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <maxpain@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org [Christian Simon: Rebased for 6.12.y, due to mainline change https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240929144239.GA9475@redhat.com/] Signed-off-by: Christian Simon <simon@swine.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> (cherry-picked from commit eff00c5e29abfc919a0647cb85c5ac6a5d6e1f0a linux-6.6.y) Signed-off-by: Krister Johansen <kjlx@templeofstupid.com> Acked-by: Massimiliano Pellizzer <massimiliano.pellizzer@canonical.com> Acked-by: Kuba Pawlak <kuba.pawlak@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Mehmet Basaran <mehmet.basaran@canonical.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I have kernel panic almost every day on Talos Linux v1.8.2 (Linux 6.6.58).
Talos is deployed on bare metal nodes (Dell R6615) with NVMe SSD.
For the network, I use Broadcom 2x25G (50G in LACP bonding) with MTU 9000 (jumbo frame).
I use an image built on factory.talos.dev:
For CNI I use Cilium in eBPF mode.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: